Skip to content
Red Wolf Productions Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Red Wolf Productions Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$458kAnimals$5kPhilanthropy$5kEnvironment$4kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$3kReligion$500Housing & Shelter$50
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$1,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC$30,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$3,500
UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA$1,800
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$1,800
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$1,000
RAPTOR TRUST$1,000
ZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHADOW WARRIORS PROJECT: $500 → 9%FREE YEZIDI FOUNDATION: $680 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Red Wolf Productions Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Red Wolf Productions Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$448k · 4 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
21

Total granted

$448k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $440k · revenue +77%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • UP
    UNITED POULTRY CONCERNS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Let the Animals Live

Let the Animals Live-Israel is a Non-profit organization which is set to provide help to animals in distress, rehabilitate them and find them homes. Over the years the organization has raised the awareness of the importance of animal…

Animals
2
World Jewish Relief Usa Inc

World jewish relief usa inc supports life-saving and life-changing action to assist and empower people in crisis around the world.

Religion
3
Dror for the Wounded Foundation Inc

To provide financial assistance to severely wounded veterans of the israel defense forces

—
4
Israel Rescue Coalition Inc

To support medical first responder services throughout the world, including search and rescue missions, international disaster response missions, and medical evacuation.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
American Friends of Idf Widows and Orphans Organization Inc

American Friends of IDFWO is dedicated to providing financial, emotional, and social support to the families of Israeli soldiers who have sacrificed their lives in service. We aim to honor their legacy and help rebuild the lives of widows…

Human Services
6
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
7
Animal Freedom Inc

The organization works to create a world where all animals have their freedom respected by society and protected in law.

Animals
8
Asia Wild

Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…

Animals
9
Network for Animals Usa Inc

Network for Animals crusades against cruelty to animals by focusing on direct action, often in far-flung, otherwise neglected places around the globe. We receive no government grants and rely on the generosity of our supporters to conduct…

Animals
10
World Federation for Animals Inc

The world federation for animals (wfa) is a membership organization to improve the well-being of all animals and end exploitation and suffering. wfa has three primary focus areas: policy research, analysis, and information sharing;…

Animals
11
Friends of Israel Disabled Veterans Inc

To raise funds in israel and abroad for maintaining the existing, and building new beit halochem centers, purchasing equipment and operating the vast rehabilitation network of the zahal disabled veterans organization. this includes the…

International
12
American Friends of Israel Emergency Aid Fund

To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brothers for Life; the most unlike its peers is Zichron Tzvi Elimelech. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC: $440,000 · PhilanthropySTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINCPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,300 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,800 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $1,800 · OtherTHE INTREPID FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherUNITED WITH ISRAEL CO Ne'eman Foundation: $750 · OtherMARKET STREET MISSION INC: $500 · OtherZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $500 · OtherJUST IN TIME RESCUE: $500 · OtherNJ FREEDOM FARM ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250 · Other+5 more: $727 · OtherCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $3,600 · AnimalsTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $2,000 · AnimalsCOW SANCTUARY: $500 · Animals+1 more: $150 · AnimalsBrothers for Life: $2,800 · Arts & CultureNo One Left Behind: $1,000 · Human ServicesFREE YEZIDI FOUNDATION USA INCORPORATED: $680 · Human ServicesSWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $11 · Human ServicesUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA: $1,800 · Civil RightsUNITED POULTRY CONCERNS INC: $1,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $250 · International
Philanthropy$457,100Other$6,527Animals$6,250Arts & Culture$2,800Human Services$2,191Civil Rights$1,800Public Benefit$1,000International$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC: $440,000 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $15,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED POULTRY CONCERNS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE YEZIDI FOUNDATION USA INCORPORATED: $680 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOW SANCTUARY: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFunny Farm Rescue a NJ Non Profit: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWild Heart Ranch Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR INC: $11 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Red Wolf Productions Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Red Wolf Productions Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Red Wolf Productions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home