· Private foundation
Red Wolf Productions Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC | $30,000 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC | $3,500 |
| UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA | $1,800 |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | $1,800 |
| BROTHERS FOR LIFE | $1,000 |
| RAPTOR TRUST | $1,000 |
| ZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of Red Wolf Productions Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSTRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC5× · 2021–2025 · $440k · revenue +77%
- CFCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue 0%
- BFBrothers for Life2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- AGAMERICA GIVES INCone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $2k
- UPUNITED POULTRY CONCERNS INCone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Let the Animals Live-Israel is a Non-profit organization which is set to provide help to animals in distress, rehabilitate them and find them homes. Over the years the organization has raised the awareness of the importance of animal…
World jewish relief usa inc supports life-saving and life-changing action to assist and empower people in crisis around the world.
To provide financial assistance to severely wounded veterans of the israel defense forces
To support medical first responder services throughout the world, including search and rescue missions, international disaster response missions, and medical evacuation.
American Friends of IDFWO is dedicated to providing financial, emotional, and social support to the families of Israeli soldiers who have sacrificed their lives in service. We aim to honor their legacy and help rebuild the lives of widows…
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
The organization works to create a world where all animals have their freedom respected by society and protected in law.
Asia Wild is committed to rescuing and protecting the welfare of animals worldwide. They support small, locally-focused organizations that tirelessly combat numerous issues that threaten wildlife survival, including poaching, abuse,…
Network for Animals crusades against cruelty to animals by focusing on direct action, often in far-flung, otherwise neglected places around the globe. We receive no government grants and rely on the generosity of our supporters to conduct…
The world federation for animals (wfa) is a membership organization to improve the well-being of all animals and end exploitation and suffering. wfa has three primary focus areas: policy research, analysis, and information sharing;…
To raise funds in israel and abroad for maintaining the existing, and building new beit halochem centers, purchasing equipment and operating the vast rehabilitation network of the zahal disabled veterans organization. this includes the…
To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brothers for Life and the most unlike its peers is Zichron Tzvi Elimelech. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STRUGGLE TO SAVE ETHIOPIAN JEWRYINC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
- Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED POULTRY CONCERNS INC ↗
- Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
- Who funds FREE YEZIDI FOUNDATION USA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SWP INC dba SHADOW WARRIORS ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH ↗
- Who funds COW SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds Funny Farm Rescue a NJ Non Profit ↗
- Who funds Wild Heart Ranch Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation ↗
- Who funds Met Council Inc ↗
- Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Red Wolf Productions Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.