Skip to content

· Private foundation

Red Ribbon Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$144k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$591kArts & Culture$105kHuman Services$36kCivil Rights$15kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $112k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKALOOSA AIDS SUPPORT AND INFORMATIONAL SERVICES INC - OASIS$111,587
PENSACOLA LGBT FILM FESTIVAL$12,000
TOGETHER WE WEATHER$10,000
PENSACOLA OPERA$9,000
SUNDAYS CHILD INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TOGETHER WE WEATHER: $10k → 16%TOGETHER WE WEATHER: $10k → 16%TOGETHER WE WEATHER: $10k → 16%TOGETHER WE WEATHER: $5k → 16%TOGETHER WE WEATHER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$687k · 8 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$687k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+22%

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    OKALOOSA AIDS SUPPORT AND INFORMATIONAL SERVICES INC- OASIS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $542k · revenue +63%
  • DS
    Del Shores Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $240 · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pride Cape Coral Inc

To Facilitate a welcoming environment for members and allies of the LGBTQ+ community through education , support and recognition.

Public Benefit
2
Pride - Swfl Inc

To provide the citizenry of southwest florida with a positive image of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people and to create functions and events throughout the year promoting educational, civic, and cultural activities that further…

Public Benefit
3
Come Out St Pete Inc

Come out st pete parade & festival

Civil Rights
4
Triad Pride Performing Arts

Triad pride performing arts consists of lgbtq and their allies, who perform to entertain, enlighten and enrich while promoting equality and social justice for all people regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity - fostering…

Arts & Culture
5
Pensacola Survivors Inc

Suicide prevention awareness an

—
6
Out Arts and Culture

The Out Arts and Culture is committed to promoting awareness of the diversity of experiences contributions and needs of people who are lesbian gay bisexual transgender and or queer.

Education
7
Nu Sass Productions

Nu Sass Productions promotes marginalized genders in all aspects of theater especially in those roles traditionally dominated by cis-men. We explore how disregarding prescribed gender norms can alter the audiences overall experience. We…

Arts & Culture
8
Space Coast Pride Inc

Its primary focus is to foster a sense of community among the LGBTQ community and to bridge the divide within all aspects of our lives The Space Coast Pride Festival Parade is the pinnacle of our efforts Space Coast Pride is committed to…

Human Services
9
Seminole Cultural Arts Theatre Inc

Renovation & performances of the seminole theatre

Arts & Culture
10
Macon Pride Inc

The purpose of macon pride is to advance unity, visibility and self-esteem among lgbtqia+ persons and our allies, and to promote a positive image in the middle georgia area through community activities and service. macon pride will educate…

Civil Rights
11
Outsider Film and Arts Festival

Support lgbtq art and academics

Arts & Culture
12
Pandora Productions Inc

Celebrating the transformational power of theatre, entertaining and engaging with bold, cuting edge theatrical events that give voice to the lgbtq+ experience.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pensacola Little Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mother Wit Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKALOOSA AIDS SUPPORT AND INFORMATIONAL SERVICES INC- OASIS: $541,857 · Human ServicesOKALOOSA AIDS SUPPORT AND INFORMATIONAL SERVICES INC- OASISTogether We Weather: $36,150 · Human ServicesTogether We WeatherPENSACOLA LGBT FILM FESTIVAL INC: $55,070 · Arts & CulturePENSACOLA LGBT …PENSACOLA LITTLE THEATRE INC: $28,500 · Arts & CulturePENSACOLA LITTL…Del Shores Foundation: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDel Shores Foun…PENSACOLA OPERA INC: $9,000 · Arts & CulturePENSACOLA OPERA…INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $23,300 · OtherINTERFAIT…Individual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividua…Individual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividua…EVOLVE N THRIVE: $10,000 · OtherEVOLVE N …MOTHER WIT INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · OtherMOTHER WI…+1 more: $2,000 · OtherSUNDAY'S CHILD INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $240 · Civil Rights
Human Services$578,007Arts & Culture$102,570Other$66,300Civil Rights$5,240

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKALOOSA AIDS SUPPORT AND INFORMATIONAL SERVICES INC- OASIS: $541,857 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetPENSACOLA LGBT FILM FESTIVAL INC: $55,070 over 5y, 22% of budgetTogether We Weather: $36,150 over 5y, 70% of budgetPENSACOLA LITTLE THEATRE INC: $28,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDel Shores Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPENSACOLA OPERA INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSUNDAY'S CHILD INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $240 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Perry Family FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Perry Family Foundation · The Bear Family Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Red Ribbon Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Red Ribbon Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pensacola Little Theatre Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Red Ribbon’s filings →

More from the funding graph