Skip to content
Red Devil Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Red Devil Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$11kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$4kInternational$3kCivil Rights$3kPhilanthropy$2kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BSA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $250 → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $250 → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $200 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 10 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$24k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +98%
  • Flemington Area Food Pantry Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +226%
  • SA
    SPONDYLITIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +44%
  • OXFAM-AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +16%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +145%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Alliance for Aging Research

The alliance for aging research is the leading nonprofit organization dedicated to changing the narrative to achieve healthy aging and equitable access to care.

—
6
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
8
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
The Assistance Fund Inc

To help insured people with life-changing diseases overcome the financial barriers preventing them from accessing treatment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pryor Tiger Diamond Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY -TULSA: $11,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY -TULSAINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BSA: $2,600 · OtherINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BSACOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF E OKLAHOMA: $1,700 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF E OKLAHOMAST JUDE CHILDRENS RESAERCH HOSP: $1,500 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESAERCH HOSPAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1,350 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,100 · OtherST BRIGID & ST ELIZABETH RC: $1,000 · Other+5 more: $1,750 · Other+5 moreSPONDYLITIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $1,200 · HealthSPONDYLITIS …ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $450 · HealthALZHEIMER'S …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,700 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 · InternationalTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationPryor Tiger Diamond Club: $500 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $374 · EducationMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF HUNTERDON COUNTY: $250 · PhilanthropyFlemington Area Food Pantry Inc: $1,700 · Human ServicesNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $250 · EnvironmentTEAM RUBICON INC: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$22,000Health$3,650International$2,700Education$1,874Philanthropy$1,750Human Services$1,700Environment$250Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFlemington Area Food Pantry Inc: $1,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPONDYLITIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPryor Tiger Diamond Club: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $374 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF HUNTERDON COUNTY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Red Devil Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Red Devil Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • United Way of Hunterdon County: 10% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Red Devil’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home