Skip to content
Rechieve Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rechieve Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$34kEducation$21kHuman Services$9kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$2kHousing & Shelter$2kFood & Nutrition$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,060
Median grant
1
States reached
$370k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$7,250
Individual grant recipient$3,447
MAJOR BRENT TAYLOR FOUNDATION$2,060
YOUTH IMPACT$1,600
OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$526
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $2k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $600 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 7 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
16

Total granted

$76k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+22%

Still filing today

43%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $31k · revenue +106%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2018–2025 · $22k
  • MB
    MAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue -10%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • MB
    MISTY BRIDGES FAMILY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • WC
    Weber County School District Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +301%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Park City Day School

Park city day school educates children from preschool to 8th grade with a mission to prepare and inspire our students to lead great and giving lives.

Education
2
Park City Education Foundation

Our mission is to fund and support educator-powered initiatives that inspire all Park City students to reach their academic and lifelong potential.

Education
3
Venture Academy

Inspire the rising generation to reach the heights of their potential, ignite their curiosity to venture into challenging new learning experiences, and through service, empower them to be leaders who are committed to family and community…

Education
4
Timpanogos Academy Foundation

To establish a school where each student gains the scholarly knowledge and skills vital to becoming a self-motivated, lifelong learner and to succeed in the rapidly evolving and complex world. This mission will be accomplished by using the…

Education
5
Leadership Academy of Utah

To prepare promising students for meaningful lives as principled leaders.

Education
6
Utah Arts Academy

Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education
7
Salt Lake Education Foundation

To promote student success in the Salt Lake City School District by using private donations to supplement children's educational experiences.

Philanthropy
8
Terra Academy

Terra academy focuses on each student as a "unique" whole person in a global society by providing individualized instruction in a community learning model through educational experiences including a broad range of curricular options and…

Education
9
Utah Youth Sports Academy Foundation Fka Rsl Youth Academy Foundation
Recreation & Sports
10
Salt Lake Arts Academy

To prepare students to become confident and creative builders of their future, equipped through the arts and academics to take responsibility for shaping their communities.

Education
11
Pinnacle Canyon Academy Inc

Kindergarten through 12th grade charter school in the State of Utah.

Education
12
Canyons School District Education Foundation

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ycc Family Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Piney Woods School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $21,517 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSalvation Army: $4,001 · OtherSalvation ArmyYOUTH IMPACT INCORPORATED: $3,730 · OtherYOUTH IMPACT INCORPORATEDMISTY BRIDGES FAMILY: $3,538 · OtherMISTY BRIDGES FAMILYWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,250 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYPark City Ski & Snowboard: $2,116 · OtherTREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $1,500 · Other+8 more: $4,128 · Other+8 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $30,578 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVISMAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC: $7,560 · EducationMAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LE…OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,340 · EducationOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATI…Weber County School District Foundation: $2,500 · EducationWeber County School D…+2 more: $603 · EducationFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $1,500 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $600 · Human ServicesPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$43,780Youth Development$30,578Education$18,003Human Services$2,100Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $30,578 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC: $7,560 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,340 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWeber County School District Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS ↗
  • Who funds MAJOR BRENT TAYLOR LEADERSHIP LEGAC ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Weber County School District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WINTER SPORTS SCHOOL IN PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Piney Woods School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Larry H Miller and Ga…Wadman FoundationThe Alan and Jeanne H…George S and Dolores …The Scott D and Carol…America First Credit …Nebeker Family Founda…United Way of Norther…Pacificorp Foundation…Ascent Credit Union F…James E & Norma Kier …Beaver Creek Foundati…
Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family FoundationUT19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Wadman Foundation · The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Scott D and Carol a Nelson Family Foundation · America First Credit Union Charitable Foundation · Nebeker Family Foundation · United Way of Northern Utah · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Ascent Credit Union Foundation · James E & Norma Kier Charitable Foundation · Beaver Creek Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rechieve Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rechieve Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rechieve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home