Skip to content

· Public charity

Rebridge

To build relational bridges that enable western believers to connect, encourage and empower christian leaders in the greater middle east, to share the love of jesus.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$778kInternational$82kEnvironment$45kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $112,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $167,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIBLE MISSION INT'L$40,000
BEACON MINISTRIES$30,000
MIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH$20,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
SPRITUAL CARE LINK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%SAVE A LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 7%ASIAN CHILD RESCUE MINISTRIES: $20k → 12%ASIAN CHILD RESCUE MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
AZ
NC
SC
OK
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $25k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$25k · 100% · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$750k · 6 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
15

Total granted

$750k
$264k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-11%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $277k · revenue +6%
  • BM
    BIBLE MISSION INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $97k · revenue +10%
  • AC
    Aslan Child Rescue Ministries Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • 1L
    1000 LIGHTHOUSES
    one grant, 2021 · $45k
  • AB
    Antioch Bridge of Life Etc Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -72%
  • SA
    SAVE A LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
2
Destiny Ministries International Inc

Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible

Religion
3
Christian Ministries International
—
4
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
5
Christian Mission Charities Inc

Christian support for third world countr

International
6
Global Radio Outreach

Our Gospel Radio Program in Arabic was inaugurated in 1993, broadcast from the Middle East on 5 transmitters and on the internet. Approximately 350 million Arabs can receive the programs. Our Farsi Gospel Radio Program was inaugurated in…

Religion
7
Worldwide Bible Society

We do bible translation with the kingdom perspective, therefore we go beyond making "a" new chinese translation for the chinese only; we strive to serve the ethnic minority groups in china and other countries as well. crossing national and…

Religion
8
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
9
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
10
Worldcast Ministries

Publishing, writing, sales & distribution of Christian Books; speaking throughout the US and foreign countries on Christian subjects. Attending orphanages, Christian schools and Bible colleges in the US and foreign countries assisting in…

Religion
11
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
12
Silk Wave Mission

SWM Mission is an abbreviation for Silk Wave Mission, and is an organization that serves as a united prayer movement, church planting movement, and missionary church movement for spiritual recovery and revival in Turkey and the Islamic…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Outreach Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aslan Child Rescue Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEACON MINISTRIES INC: $200,300 · OtherBEACON MINISTRIES INCIndividual grant recipient: $79,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIBLE MISSION INT'L: $67,000 · OtherBIBLE MISSION INT'L1000 LIGHTHOUSES: $45,000 · Other1000 LIGHTHOUSESARABIC BIBLE OUTREACH MINISTRY: $20,202 · OtherCHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $98,600 · Other+9 moreMIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH: $276,720 · EducationMIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACHBIBLE MISSION INTERNATIONAL: $97,200 · ReligionBIBLE MISSIO…SPIRITUAL CARE LINK: $10,000 · ReligionSPIRITUAL CA…CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL: $10,000 · ReligionCROSSOVER CO…Aslan Child Rescue Ministries Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesSAVE A LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesAntioch Bridge of Life Etc Inc: $40,000 · International
Other$530,102Education$276,720Religion$117,200Human Services$60,000International$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH: $276,720 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBIBLE MISSION INTERNATIONAL: $97,200 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAntioch Bridge of Life Etc Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetAslan Child Rescue Ministries Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSAVE A LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWORLD OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST BIBLE OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE MISSION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Antioch Bridge of Life Etc Inc ↗
  • Who funds Aslan Child Rescue Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPIRITUAL CARE LINK ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNICATIONS INTL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rebridge funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rebridge. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rebridge?

    Find your warmest path to Rebridge through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rebridge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph