Skip to content

· Public charity

Realize Impact

Realize Impact is organized and operated exclusively for the charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code, specifically to provide financial support, mentorship, and other assistance to early-stage socially-, environmentally-, health-.

$9.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$10MCommunity Improvement$4.3MHealth$2.0MCivil Rights$943kHuman Services$314kFood & Nutrition$310kEducation$200kEnvironment$180kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 36 grants below total $8,249,449, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,153,265 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $903,816 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $415k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+7 grants · $6.5M
$49,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,168,000
GitLab Foundation$975,000
Beneficial Returns$651,510
Delta40 Venture Studio Corporation$609,375
Small Business Silver Lining$463,125
Denkyem$358,424
gDiapers$266,136
Individual grant recipient$243,750
Individual grant recipient$219,375
Artha Networks$195,000
SOCAP$190,125
Ocean Plastics Recovery Project$100,001
Campus Evolve$95,000
Vanguard Charitable$77,859
Up Until Now$71,092
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $943k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Black Lives Matter: $691k → 12%Black Lives Matter: $187k → 12%Black Lives Matter: $54k → 12%Black Lives Matter: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NM
NC
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 17 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$13M
$547k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+105%

Still filing today

12%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    Silver Lining Ltd USA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.7M
  • BR
    Beneficial Returns
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.2M
  • DV
    Delta40 Venture Studio Corporation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.1M

Funded once

  • TA
    The AMP Community
    one grant, 2023 · $117k
  • SC
    Silvaseed Company
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CF
    Cooperatives for a Better Worldgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
3
Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc

Investing charitable capital to create economic, social, and spiritual transformation

Philanthropy
4
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
5
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
6
Social Finance Inc

Social finance builds innovative partnerships and investments that realign systems to measurably improve lives.

Human Services
7
Impact Charitable

Impact charitable unites catalytic philanthropists with community partners, financial institutions, foundations, social enterprises, and governmental bodies. as an impact capital catalyst, impact charitable unlocks and accelerates capital…

Philanthropy
8
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven by three…

—
9
Fund for Guaranteed Income

Fund for Guaranteed Income ("F4GI") supports the research, infrastructure, and implementation of guaranteed income initiatives, including Compton Pledge, Long Beach Pledge, and Chicago Future Fund.

Human Services
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Calvert Impact Capital Inc

Calvert impact capital, inc. works for the benefit of underserved communities and individuals and to achieve a more equitable and sustainable world by maximizing the flow of capital in furtherance of such goals.

Community Improvement
12
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Gitlab Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Silver Lining Ltd USA: $3,671,550 · OtherSilver Lining Ltd USAIndividual grant recipient: $3,168,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBeneficial Returns: $2,186,329 · OtherBeneficial ReturnsDelta40 Venture Studio Corporation: $2,071,875 · OtherDelta40 Venture Studio CorporationDenkyem: $897,429 · OtherDenkyemMISSION DRIVEN FINANCE: $853,125 · OtherRiseKit: $563,460 · Other+30 more: $2,949,827 · Other+30 moreGITLAB FOUNDATION: $975,000 · PhilanthropyGITLAB FO…IMPACTASSETSINC: $254,855 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASS…SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $145,758 · PhilanthropySEATTLE F…VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $98,443 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD …+7 more: $202,532 · Philanthropy+7 moreBLACK LIVES MATTER 5280: $942,815 · Human ServicesCooperatives for a Better World: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTMC COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $50,000 · Community ImprovementNew Mexico Angels Inc: $23,156 · Community ImprovementBRIDGING VIRGINIA INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $8,527 · Community ImprovementTHIRD ACT EDUCATION FUND INC: $40,364 · EnvironmentMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · ReligionTHE GRADY SCHOOL DBA THE MADRONE SCHOOL: $5,146 · Education
Other$16,361,595Philanthropy$1,676,588Human Services$942,815Arts & Culture$100,000Community Improvement$91,683Environment$40,364Religion$10,000Education$5,146

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGITLAB FOUNDATION: $975,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBLACK LIVES MATTER 5280: $942,815 over 4y, 47% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC: $254,855 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $145,758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCooperatives for a Better World: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $98,443 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BESSEMER GIVING FUND: $52,683 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTMC COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah: $43,313 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD ACT EDUCATION FUND INC: $40,364 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $36,342 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $30,851 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $29,164 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Mexico Angels Inc: $23,156 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetMISSOULA INTERFAITH COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBRIDGING VIRGINIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $8,527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRADY SCHOOL DBA THE MADRONE SCHOOL: $5,146 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN GIFT FUND: $5,146 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $5,033 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GITLAB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLACK LIVES MATTER 5280 ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cooperatives for a Better World ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE BESSEMER GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds TMC COMMUNITY CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Utah ↗
  • Who funds THIRD ACT EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE CIRCLE 4 ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN4.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Realize Impact funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Realize Impact. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Realize Impact?

    Find your warmest path to Realize Impact through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Realize Impact’s filings →

    More from the funding graph