Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rdl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$472k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$857kHuman Services$325kArts & Culture$231kAnimals$209kEducation$185kCommunity Improvement$125kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kEnvironment$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $222k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION$150,000
WEST MEAD #1 VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY$50,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$50,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$40,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC$25,000
ACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION$25,000
MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN$25,000
TAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER$22,000
WOMEN'S SERVICES INC$20,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$20,000
MEADVILLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS$15,000
INNER-CITY NEIGHBORHOOD ART HOUSE$15,000
CRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS PROGRAM (CHAPS)$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $5k → 10%HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $5k → 10%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15k → 14%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 19 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$1.9M
$201k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+32%

Still filing today

74%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $175k · revenue +1%
  • AA
    ACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +113%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • TA
    The ARC of Crawford County Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • WM
    WEST MED VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • CC
    CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $26k · revenue +296%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
4
International Center for the Preservation of Wild Animals Inc

The wilds is a conservation center and safari park operating as a not-for-profit 501(c)3 organization on nearly 10,000-acres in southeastern ohio. the wilds specializes in high-quality recreational opportunities that focus on connecting…

Animals
5
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
6
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
7
Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services
8
Crouse Community Center Inc

Crouse community center, inc is a residential health care facility whose mission is to provide long term health care, rehabilitation, and adult day care services to area residents requiring 24 hour skilled nursing residential health care…

Health
9
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
10
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
11
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
12
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $175,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONWOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $80,000 · OtherWOMEN'S SERVICES INCMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $70,000 · OtherMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INCINNER-CITY NEIGHBORHOOD ART HOUSE: $60,000 · OtherINNER-CITY NEIGHBORHOOD ART HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST MEAD #1 VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $50,000 · OtherWEST MEAD #1 VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANYMEADVILLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS: $50,000 · OtherMEADVILLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTSThe ARC of Crawford County Inc: $50,000 · OtherThe ARC of Crawford County IncSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · OtherWEST MED VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $30,000 · OtherFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY: $60,000 · OtherFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY+5 more: $95,000 · Other+5 moreHAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $420,000 · HealthHAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATIONMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $167,000 · HealthMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATI…CRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS PROGRAM INC: $45,000 · HealthCRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWA…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthTAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER: $104,000 · AnimalsTAMARACK W…Erie Zoological Society: $70,000 · AnimalsErie Zoolo…NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $20,000 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAN…HOLLYS NEST: $15,000 · AnimalsHOLLYS NES…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $175,000 · EducationDUKE UNIV…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $10,000 · EducationCOMMUNITI…CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesHANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Community ImprovementSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,800 · Arts & Culture
Other$815,000Health$642,000Animals$209,000Education$185,000Human Services$135,000Community Improvement$125,000Arts & Culture$75,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $420,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $167,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $125,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER: $104,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetWOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetErie Zoological Society: $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY: $60,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetThe ARC of Crawford County Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS PROGRAM INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,800 over 1y, 22% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEADVILLE COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACTIVE AGING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMARACK WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Erie Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH CREEK VALLEY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The ARC of Crawford County Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAWFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEADVILLE COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYS NEST ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ljl Family FoundationPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ljl Family Foundation · Ainsworth Foundation · Erie Community Foundation · Crawford Heritage Community Foundation · Harry Winslow Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rdl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rdl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rdl Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rdl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rdl Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph