· Private foundation
Rdh Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DENVER RESCUE MISSION | $40,000 |
| AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT | $10,000 |
| CLASSIC BALLET ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| YAVAPAI FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY PRESCOTT CORP | $10,000 |
| PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS | $10,000 |
| GATEWAYS TO BETTER EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY RESCUE MISSION | $5,000 |
| PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| JUDICAL WATCH | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF YIMBO | $5,000 |
| PARADISE ADVENTIST ACADEMY | $3,000 |
| CHICO OAKS ADVENTIST SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| IRVINE INTER ACADEMY PTO | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Rdh Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 19% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DRDENVER RESCUE MISSION6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +26%
- PMPRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS4× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +4%
- AHAGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC4× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +178%
Funded once
- LRLex Rex Institute (Gavel Project)one grant, 2022 · $20k
- UOUniversity of Loma Linda Medical Schoolsone grant, 2020 · $10k
- ETEpoch Times Incone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance the natural history, conservation and ecosystem knowledge of the Tahoe region through science, education and outreach.
A membership organization dedicated to developing, promoting, and serving your business and community. Our goal is to sustain a high quality of life by achieving economic vitality, with sensitivity and respect for the environment.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.
At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.
Our Mission is to instill and nurture a passion for all snow sports along with developing character, discipline and desire, which encourages young athletes to reach their highest potential.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
Our mission is to protect public trail access build and maintain safe and sustainable trails and promote public engagement in land stewardship and trail use for all types of outdoor recreation.
Bear Yuba Land Trust exists to conserve and protect the natural, working, and cultural lands in the Bear and Yuba River watersheds and empower a healthy, resilient community through nature access and education.
At slv go! our mission is to connect people to the outdoors by expanding opportunities for trails, parks, and public lands through community-driven initiatives.
The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sos Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Lindell Recovery Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Yavapai Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF YIMBO ↗
- Who funds GATEWAYS TO BETTER EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Pacific Justice Institute ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds PRETEND CITY THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds VINDEX MEDIA ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Be Better Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Prescott Symphony Organization ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC ↗
- Who funds EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Martis Camp Community Foundation Dba Martis Camp Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Tahoe Fund · Margaret T Morris Foundation · The Martis Fund · The Corrigan-Walla Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rdh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- American Whitewater — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.