Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rb Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$191kReligion$80kHealth$53kHuman Services$52kInternational$45kYouth Development$37kArts & Culture$18kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,200
Median grant
11
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRU$11,175
FRIENDS OF FORMAN CHR COLLEGE$3,850
Individual grant recipient$3,850
WORLD MINISTRIES$3,520
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$3,520
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$3,300
MISSION TO THE WORLD DIASO$2,750
LIFE BUILDERS - DETROIT$2,200
SUDAN INTER MINISTRY$1,650
FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INTERNATIONAL$1,650
PRAGER UNIVERSITY$1,500
GENESIS COUNSELING$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,200
PAK 7$1,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION - LA: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ID
IL
MI
OR
CA
NE
MD
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 51% of Rb Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 19% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Rb Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$525k · 34 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
10

Total granted

$525k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+55%

Still filing today

32%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Friends of Forman Christian College Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +42%
  • WM
    WORLD MINISTRIES A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +49%
  • GC
    Genesis Counseling Service
    8× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE C INT'L STUDENT
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Reformed Mission Services

To mobilize the body of Christ to demonstrate Christs compassion through local churches for the advancement of the gospel. We desire to prepare church members as the body of Christ to be ready to serve by equipping them and providing…

Health
3
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
4
Redeemer Dubai

Redeemer Dubai provides financial support for churches and church planting activities across the Middle East region

Religion
5
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

6
Global Radio Outreach

Our Gospel Radio Program in Arabic was inaugurated in 1993, broadcast from the Middle East on 5 transmitters and on the internet. Approximately 350 million Arabs can receive the programs. Our Farsi Gospel Radio Program was inaugurated in…

Religion
7
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
8
Reaching Souls International Inc

Our mission is in our name - Reaching Souls. Our core driving force, the reason we exist as an organization, is to reach souls for Christ. Our strategic purpose is to reach the maximum number of people for Christ in the least amount of…

Religion
9
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
10
Ecs Ministries

To glorify God by providing biblically sound resources and structured study material to teach people from every nation to accept Christ as their Savior and Lord, grow in Christ, and share their faith with others.

Religion
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

12
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebirth Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Redlands High School Vocal Music Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRU — $148,925 · OtherCRUIndividual grant recipient — $33,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP — $27,420 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIPMISSION TO THE WORLD DIASO — $25,750 · OtherMISSION TO THE WORLD DIASOFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $24,800 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYIndividual grant recipient — $24,200 · OtherLIFE BUILDERS - DETROIT — $18,700 · OtherSUDAN INTER MINISTRY — $18,250 · Other+28 more — $132,290 · Other+28 moreWORLD MINISTRIES A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $25,720 · ReligionPAK7 US Inc — $6,800 · ReligionResourcing Christian Education International — $4,000 · ReligionFriends of Forman Christian College Inc — $31,850 · Education+1 more — $210 · EducationNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $6,650 · HealthRebirth Homes Inc — $5,100 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · HealthARAB AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP CENTER — $2,000 · Community ImprovementUNION RESCUE MISSION — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$454,185Religion$36,520Education$32,060Health$12,750Community Improvement$2,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFriends of Forman Christian College Inc — $31,850 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD MINISTRIES A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $25,720 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGenesis Counseling Service — $14,250 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMinistry Dynamics — $8,600 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPAK7 US Inc — $6,800 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $6,650 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRebirth Homes Inc — $5,100 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetResourcing Christian Education International — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHANDLER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,670 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDLANDS HIGH SCHOOL VOCAL MUSIC BOOSTERS — $210 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends of Forman Christian College Inc
  • Who funds WORLD MINISTRIES A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Genesis Counseling Service
  • Who funds Ministry Dynamics
  • Who funds PAK7 US Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
  • Who funds Rebirth Homes Inc
  • Who funds Resourcing Christian Education International
  • Who funds CHANDLER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ARAB AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP CENTER
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rb Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph