Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rb and Twyla Sheldahl Foundation Sheldahl

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.2MYouth Development$263kHuman Services$261kHealth$102kHousing & Shelter$52kInternational$37kEducation$37kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100,000
YOUNG LIFE INTERNATIONAL$35,000
MIDWEST FOOD BANK$27,033
SUN VALLEY CHURCH$25,000
LIVING WATER OF THE VALLEY CHURCH$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER INC: $1k → 10%INSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION: $15k → 16%INSTITUTE OF AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION (BUV): $10k → 16%INSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION: $10k → 16%HOPE & A FUTURE: $10k → 11%PARENTING SPECIAL KIDS NETWORK: $10k → 11%H10 MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 15 repeat orgs$516k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
35

Total granted

$2.8M
$405k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+32%

Still filing today

33%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $98k · revenue +59%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +40%
  • OA
    ORCHARD AFRICA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • ST
    SPREAD TRUTH MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +32%
  • GE
    GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Jesus for Asia Inc

Jesus for asia exists for one purpose: to see as many people as possible accept eternal life before it's too late. we do this by going to the least reached section of the planet and by calling the church to re-engage its mission. in other…

Religion
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Christian Adventures International Inc

Evangelism; Evangelism Training; Global Outreach Global Advancement of the Gospel through Tent Ministries and Conferences Television and Literature Distribution

Religion
5
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
6
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
7
Joy in the Harvest

To serve Christ by providing expertise, resources, and leadership to help the church make Christian Disciples in foreign lands, and to render assistance to the poor, sick, and needy in our places of service.

Religion
8
What Matters Ministries and Missions

The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.

Religion
9
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
10
A Jesus Mission

A Jesus Mission creates unique opportunities for individuals or teams to serves as Christian missionaires around the world through traditional evangelism, discipleship training, and outreach.

Religion
11
Joshua Nations International

Spreading christianity worldwide.

Religion
12
Dynamic Church Planting International

Equipping leaders to plant dynamic churches worldwide.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blessman International Inc; the most unlike its peers is East Valley Athletes for Christ Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $1,065,432 · OtherMIDWEST FOOD BANKSUN VALLEY CHURCH: $662,700 · OtherSUN VALLEY CHURCHYOUNG LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $232,800 · OtherYOUNG LIFE INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $200,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMERGE COUNSELING SERVICES: $200,000 · OtherEMERGE COUNSELING SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+31 more: $312,350 · Other+31 moreFresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc: $155,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $97,500 · Youth DevelopmentST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthSPREAD TRUTH MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S CUP: $21,000 · ReligionTHE SHERRARD INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionINSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION: $35,000 · Human ServicesPARENTING SPECIAL KIDS NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPE AND A FUTURE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesH10 Ministries: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCONGO INITIATIVE USA INC: $2,500 · Education
Other$2,774,182Youth Development$252,500Health$100,200Religion$78,000Human Services$58,000Public Safety & Disaster$30,000Education$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc: $155,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $97,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPREAD TRUTH MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION: $35,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CUP: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEAST VALLEY ATHLETES FOR CHRIST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetPARENTING SPECIAL KIDS NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHERRARD INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHOPE AND A FUTURE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMEALS FROM THE HEARTLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALVARY COMMISSION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGO INITIATIVE USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetH10 Ministries: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSMAN INTERNATIONAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SPREAD TRUTH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CUP ↗
  • Who funds EAST VALLEY ATHLETES FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTING SPECIAL KIDS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SHERRARD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AND A FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS FROM THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARD AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGO INITIATIVE USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rb and Twyla Sheldahl Foundation Sheldahl funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rb and Twyla Sheldahl Foundation Sheldahl. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rb and Twyla Sheldahl Foundation Sheldahl?

Find your warmest path to Rb and Twyla Sheldahl Foundation Sheldahl through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rb and Twyla Sheldahl Foundation Sheldahl’s filings →

More from the funding graph