Skip to content
Raymond Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Raymond Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
110
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.8MHuman Services$1.8MHealth$1.3MEducation$1.2MAnimals$1.0MYouth Development$935kEnvironment$838kHousing & Shelter$585kOther$0
02FY2024 · 110 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k57 grants · $258k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $807k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $790k
$5,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE AT UMB$225,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS$100,000
CHEBEAGUE ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$55,000
PAW TEAM$55,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$55,000
LASALLE CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREPARATORY$50,000
CRAG LAW CENTER$50,000
PEACE IN SCHOOLS$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
PETA$50,000
JPR FOUNDATION INC$50,000
OK YOU$45,000
REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE$43,125
CHEBEAGUE & CUMBERLAND LAND TRUST$40,000
MONTCLAIR FOUNDATION$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%MAGDALENE HOME: $5k → 12%HIMALAYAN STOVE PROJECT: $5k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $50k → 8%TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG: $5k → 4%THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $85k → 11%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%MAGDALENE HOME: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $50k → 8%TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG: $5k → 4%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%MAGDALENE HOME: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $50k → 8%TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG: $5k → 4%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%MAGDALENE HOME: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $43k → 8%TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG: $5k → 4%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $5k → 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 9%MAGDALENE HOME: $5k → 12%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $15k → 7%THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $13k → 7%LATINO NETWORK: $250k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $25k → 12%TASTE FOR EQUITY: $10k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $50k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $50k → 12%PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $50k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 128 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

128 repeat relationships: 77 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

128
47

Total granted

$11M
$454k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+29%

Still filing today

59%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $742k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthAnimalsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE PORTLAND PLAYHOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $505k · revenue +23%
  • ASANTE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $500k · revenue +51%
  • KAIROSPDX
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +313%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • LC
    LASALLE CATHOLIC COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • AR
    ARTISTS REPETORY THEATER
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
2
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
3
Portland Public Library

Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…

Education
4
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
7
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
8
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
9
Northeast Oregon Network

Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…

Health
10
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
11
Clackamas River Basin Council Inc

The council is organized to foster partnerships for clean water, healthy streams, and abundant fisheries in the Clackamas Watershed

Environment
12
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Opportunities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/118
Grantees still filing
79/118
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $450,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPESOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $430,000 · OtherSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERSSAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $400,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER ORCHESTRAALL SAINTS SCHOOL: $257,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE AT UMB: $225,000 · OtherPEAR: $290,000 · Other+119 more: $4,604,167 · Other+119 moreASANTE FOUNDATION: $500,000 · HealthASANTE FOUN…ISLAND COMMONS RESOURCE CENTER: $393,000 · HealthISLAND COMM…OK YOU INC: $115,000 · HealthOK YOU INCROGUE RETREAT: $70,000 · HealthROGUE RETRE…+8 more: $112,500 · Health+8 moreLatino Network: $275,000 · Human ServicesLatino Net…REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST: $193,125 · Human ServicesREFUGEE CA…PEACE IN SCHOOLS: $150,000 · Human ServicesPEACE IN S…Metropolitan Family Service: $120,000 · Human ServicesMetropolit…THE RECOMPENSE FUND: $118,334 · Human ServicesTHE RECOMP…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $40,000 · Human ServicesMagdalene Ministries International Inc: $40,000 · Human Services+9 more: $156,750 · Human Services+9 moreTHE PORTLAND PLAYHOUSE: $505,250 · Arts & CultureOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $105,000 · Arts & CultureChebeague Island Living History Farm: $58,333 · Arts & CultureAPPALSHOP INC: $50,500 · Arts & CultureOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN OREGON PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $33,000 · Arts & CultureCRATERIAN PERFORMANCES COMPANY: $33,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $113,000 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $350,000 · AnimalsPAW FUND: $305,000 · AnimalsSANCTUARY ONE: $108,500 · AnimalsPORTLAND ANIMAL WELFARE TEAM: $55,000 · Animals+7 more: $112,500 · AnimalsKAIROSPDX: $400,000 · EducationJPR FOUNDATION INC: $94,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $70,000 · EducationCHEBEAGUE ISLAND LIBRARY: $65,000 · EducationIsland Institute: $45,000 · EducationTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY: $37,500 · Education+4 more: $35,000 · EducationCRAG LAW CENTER: $240,000 · EnvironmentTHE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY: $123,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN OREGON LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentGeorges River Land Trust: $35,000 · EnvironmentNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $25,000 · EnvironmentHonnold Foundation: $25,000 · Environment+2 more: $12,500 · Environment
Other$6,656,167Health$1,190,500Human Services$1,178,209Arts & Culture$943,083Animals$931,000Education$746,500Environment$495,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PORTLAND PLAYHOUSE: $505,250 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $400,000 over 6y, 32% of budgetKAIROSPDX: $400,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetISLAND COMMONS RESOURCE CENTER: $393,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $350,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPAW FUND: $305,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetPEAR: $290,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetLatino Network: $275,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCRAG LAW CENTER: $240,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetREFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST: $193,125 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $180,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetMaine Community Foundation Inc: $166,667 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPEACE IN SCHOOLS: $150,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetCULTIVATE INITIATIVES: $145,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLives in the Balance Inc: $125,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetTHE CAMPBELL INSTITUTE: $125,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY: $123,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetMetropolitan Family Service: $120,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RECOMPENSE FUND: $118,334 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetOK YOU INC: $115,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetSANCTUARY ONE: $108,500 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY: $105,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $105,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChebeague & Cumberland Land Trust: $102,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetJPR FOUNDATION INC: $94,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetDays For Girls International: $90,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUTTONWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetARMY EMERGENCY RELIEF: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE RETREAT: $70,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCHEBEAGUE ISLAND LIBRARY: $65,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetChebeague Island Living History Farm: $58,333 over 5y, 15% of budgetPORTLAND ANIMAL WELFARE TEAM: $55,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetCHEBEAGUE ISLAND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $55,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetChebeague Island Historical Society: $54,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetAPPALSHOP INC: $50,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetIsland Institute: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChebeague Island Council: $42,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetADDICTION RECOVERY CENTER: $40,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Solutions Inc: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMASLOW PROJECT: $40,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMontclair Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PORTLAND PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND COMMONS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAW FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEAR ↗
  • Who funds Latino Network ↗
  • Who funds CRAG LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEACE IN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds CULTIVATE INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds Lives in the Balance Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPBELL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOREST PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Service ↗
  • Who funds THE RECOMPENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds OK YOU INC ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY ONE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
  • Who funds Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds JPR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Carpenter Foundat…Carrico Family Founda…Marie Lamfrom Charita…OCF Joseph E Weston P…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Autzen FoundationThe Harold & Arlene S…The Collins FoundationThe Reser Family Foun…The Ford Family Found…Careoregon Inc
The Oregon Community FoundationOR55× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Careoregon Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Living Opportunities Inc: 90% of income from government
  • Hearts With a Mission: 51% of income from government
  • The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery: 38% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Family Service: 29% of income from government
  • Maslow Project: 22% of income from government
  • Kairospdx: 19% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Rogue Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Rogue Retreat: 12% of income from government
  • The Portland Playhouse: 11% of income from government
  • Oregon Historical Society: 10% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • Literary Arts Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Ontrack Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Community Health Centers Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Craterian Performances Company: 6% of income from government
  • Children's Healing Art Project Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Oregon Museum of Science and Industry: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Montclair Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pear: 1% of income from government
  • Portland Center Stage: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
  • Southern Oregon Public Television Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Casa of Jackson County Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Campbell Institute: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Cultivate Initiatives: 0% of income from government
  • Family Solutions Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 208 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Raymond Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home