Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond and Grace Harmon Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$507kHuman Services$207kReligion$193kEducation$166kYouth Development$107kPublic Safety & Disaster$54kArts & Culture$40kCrime & Legal$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $221k
$10,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NE MO$30,500
LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY$21,850
ST JOACHIM & ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$21,148
MESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
EMMAUS HOMES INC$19,047
FACT$19,000
NEW HOPE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,180
SSM HEALTH ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL - LAKE ST LOUIS$13,915
FOSTER ADOPTION SUPPORT TEAM$10,400
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC$10,192
OASIS FOOD PANTRY$10,190
REACH ST CHARLES$10,000
EASTER SEALS MIDWEST$10,000
10-78 PROJECT$10,000
BEV ROY HOPE FOUNDATION$9,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BIRTHRIGHT: $9k → 21%BIRTHRIGHT: $6k → 21%YOUTH IN NEED: $19k → 5%FAMILY FORWARD: $22k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $20k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $13k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $11k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $11k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $10k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $10k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $8k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $8k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $8k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $5k → 11%REACH ST CHARLES: $10k → 5%YOUTH IN NEED: $10k → 5%YOUTH IN NEED: $10k → 5%YOUTH IN NEED: $9k → 5%YOUTH IN NEED: $6k → 5%COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $5k → 5%WILLOWS WAY INC: $7k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 24 repeat orgs$467k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$1.1M
$329k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+9%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    EMMAUS HOMES INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $119k · revenue +61%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    6× · 2018–2023 · $76k · revenue +2%
  • YI
    YOUTH IN NEED
    5× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • MS
    MORNING STAR CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $39k
  • LC
    LEWIS & CLARK BOATHOUSE & MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF GREATER ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
2
Perry County Services Inc

Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.

Human Services
3
Creative Concepts for Living Inc

Assist individuals with developmental disabilities in achieving the goal of living in their community of choice with the necessary support

Human Services
4
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
5
Larche St Louis

High quality, 24/7 support in neighborhood homes for persons with intellectual disabilities. inclusive educational opportunities for people in st. louis. changing the way persons with disabilities are seen and highlighting their…

Health
6
Cole County Residential Services Inc

Provide services for individuals with developmental disabilities

Health
7
Recovery St Louis
Health
8
St Louis Society for the Blind

The society enhances independence, empowers individuals and enriches the lives of people who are visually impaired or blind.

Health
9
St Louis Center

Serving individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in an intentional, faith-based community.

—
10
Missouri Centers for Independent Living
—
11
Linkability Inc

Provide Case Management for people with developmental disabilities such as autism services, respite care, crisis intervention, self directed services, and Medicaid Home and Cummunity Based Waiver programs.

Human Services
12
United Cerebral Palsy of Northwest Missouri

To positively affect the quality of life of people with cerebral palsy and other developmental disabilities through the provision of direct services, community education and by empowering self-advocacy.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Arc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reach St Charles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FACT: $141,845 · OtherFACTEMMAUS HOMES INC: $119,211 · OtherEMMAUS HOMES INCSSM ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL CANCER RESOURCE: $89,865 · OtherSSM ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL CANCER RESOURCELUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $78,573 · OtherLUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOLSAINTS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICES: $74,536 · OtherSAINTS JOACHIM AND ANN CARE SERVICESLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $74,500 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICESMT ZION BAPTIST CHURCH: $51,183 · OtherSSM HEALTH ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL - LAKE ST LOUIS: $46,789 · Other+40 more: $546,285 · Other+40 moreCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $76,011 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME…YOUTH IN NEED: $53,115 · Human ServicesYOUTH IN NEEDST LOUIS ARC INC: $50,193 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC IN…BIRTHRIGHT: $15,130 · Human ServicesBIRTHRIGHTREACH ST CHARLES: $10,000 · Human ServicesWILLOWS WAY INC: $7,400 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $43,028 · EducationTREE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationBEV ROY HOPE FOUNDATION: $29,800 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $10,192 · HealthTREE HOUSE OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $5,077 · HealthGRACE PERIOD INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterDISCOVERY EXPEDITION OF ST CHARLES MO INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureST CHARLES COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,222,787Human Services$216,849Education$68,028Health$45,069Housing & Shelter$15,000Arts & Culture$7,500Recreation & Sports$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMMAUS HOMES INC: $119,211 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $76,011 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH IN NEED: $53,115 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $50,193 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $43,028 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetBOONE CENTER INC: $21,890 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT: $15,130 over 2y, 17% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $10,192 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISCOVERY EXPEDITION OF ST CHARLES MO INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCommunity Council of St Charles County: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWILLOWS WAY INC: $7,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREE HOUSE OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $5,077 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOYCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMMAUS HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds BEV ROY HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOONE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ↗
  • Who funds GRACE PERIOD INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH ST CHARLES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO28.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · East Missouri Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Bjc Health System Dba Bjc Healthcare · Pott Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond and Grace Harmon Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond and Grace Harmon Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Raymond and Grace Harmon Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Raymond and Grace Harmon Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond and Grace Harmon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph