Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Raymond and Barbara Alpert Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10M
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$9.9M
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182023.

Philanthropy$11MEducation$420kHealth$337kHuman Services$219kCivil Rights$157kArts & Culture$121kYouth Development$55kInternational$37kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $206k
  • $250k+1 grant · $9.9M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC$9,855,793
jewish federation of greater Long Beach$205,946
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC$25,000
CONCERN FOUNDATION$13,000
HIAS INC$10,000
jewish federation of greater Long Beach$8,487
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY: $25k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES (FKA JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA): $200 → 14%ABILITYFIRST: $160k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LONG BEACH: $50k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LONG BEACH: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
MD
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 24 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$1.2M
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+32%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalCivil RightsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LB
    LONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2021 · $416k · revenue +135%
  • CR
    CONFLUENCE RISING
    3× · 2018–2022 · $123k · revenue +14%
  • PB
    PIECE BY PIECE
    3× · 2018–2022 · $75k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2018 · $151k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • HP
    HOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
4
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

5
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
6
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

10
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

11
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
12
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Rock Club- Music is the Remedy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHigher Education Support Fo…Medical Research FundingInternational Child WelfareHomeless Services & HousingPerforming Arts Organizatio…Community Health CentersJewish Advocacy and Israel …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%36%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr12%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr18%14%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr12%65%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
14%
12,075/85,259

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/37
Grantees still filing
29/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $9,855,793 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY — $1,439,433 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY+32 more — $407,165 · OtherLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION — $416,000 · Education+4 more — $5,400 · EducationABILITYFIRST — $165,000 · Human ServicesJewish Community Center of Long Beach — $55,430 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY — $25,000 · Human Services+2 more — $350 · Human ServicesCONFLUENCE RISING — $123,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $33,000 · Civil RightsPIECE BY PIECE — $75,000 · Arts & CultureThe Rock Club- Music is the Remedy — $45,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $450 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S DENTAL FOUNDATION — $110,100 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$11,702,391Education$421,400Human Services$245,780Civil Rights$156,000Arts & Culture$120,450Health$110,200Youth Development$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH & WEST ORANGE COUNTY — $1,439,433 over 2y, 96% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION — $416,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetABILITYFIRST — $165,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCONFLUENCE RISING — $123,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S DENTAL FOUNDATION — $110,100 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetPIECE BY PIECE — $75,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetJewish Community Center of Long Beach — $55,430 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Rock Club- Music is the Remedy — $45,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $33,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYBODY DANCE LA — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND PERFORMANCES — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Berro Family Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Keesal Young & Logan Charitable Foundation · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · The Rudolph J & Daphne a Munzer Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Bess J Hodges Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Raymond and Barbara Alpert Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Raymond and Barbara Alpert Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Raymond and Barbara Alpert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph