Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ray Hickey Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$825k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$1.0MHealth$935kEducation$600kFood & Nutrition$575kHuman Services$280kArts & Culture$250kHousing & Shelter$150kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+2 grants · $575k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SW WASHINGTON$325,000
COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM INC$250,000
AKIN$100,000
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$50,000
HEALING OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION$40,000
PEACEHEALTH SW MEDICAL CENTER$35,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS - CASCADES REGION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Oregon Harbor of Hope: $50k → 12%YWCA of Clark County: $75k → 9%YWCA OF CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 9%FISH OF VANCOUVER: $50k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $25k → 12%American Red Cross Cascades Region: $25k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES REGION: $25k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS - CASCADES REGION: $25k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS - CASCADES REGION: $25k → 12%AKIN: $100k → 9%THE GIVING CLOSET: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Ray Hickey Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ray Hickey Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$2.2M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+14%

Still filing today

83%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthFood & NutritionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $550k · revenue +129%
  • MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $225k · revenue +10%
  • SD
    SUNSHINE DIVISION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • Oregon State University Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -35%
  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $300k
  • HS
    Humane Society of SW Washington
    one grant, 2020 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
2
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
3
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
4
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
5
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
6
Partners in Care

Partners in care is an integrated and comprehensive end of life services organization servicing the central oregon region with home health care; in-home hospice care; in-patient hospice care in partners in care hospice house; and…

Human Services
7
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
8
Northwest Housing Alternatives

Northwest housing alternatives (nha)s mission is to create opportunity through housing. nha develops, builds, and manages affordable rental housing for families, seniors, and people with disabilities across oregon. these homes help…

Housing & Shelter
9
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
10
Sea Mar Community Health Centers

Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.

Health
11
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
12
Sheltercare

Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Home Society of Washington and the most unlike its peers is Healing Opportunities Foundation Co Healing Opportunities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily FoundationsDisability Services & Emplo…Pacific Northwest Conservat…Youth Mentorship and Develo…Faith-Based International M…Alternative Education Schoo…Homeless Services & Housing
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%9%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr14%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%10%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr19%14%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr14%61%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
1,545/12,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYPEACEHEALTH SW MEDICAL CENTER — $285,000 · OtherPEACEHEALTH SW MEDICAL CENTERHumane Society of SW Washington — $250,000 · OtherHumane Society of SW WashingtonSELF ENHANCEMENT INC — $115,000 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INCNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $100,000 · OtherNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INCSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $200,000 · OtherSUNSHINE DIVISION INCMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 · Other+10 more — $290,000 · Other+10 moreVANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $550,000 · AnimalsVANCOUVER HUMANE SOC…OREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC — $150,000 · AnimalsOREGON COAST AQUARIU…OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $50,000 · AnimalsOREGON HUMANE SOCIET…Oregon State University Foundation — $500,000 · EducationOregon State Un…THE PARK ACADEMY — $75,000 · EducationTHE PARK ACADEM…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $125,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…YWCA CLARK COUNTY — $125,000 · Human ServicesYWCA CLARK C…CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $100,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HO…FISH OF VANCOUVER — $50,000 · Human ServicesFISH OF VANC…OREGON TRAIL OF HOPE — $50,000 · Human ServicesOREGON TRAIL…The Giving Closet — $25,000 · Human ServicesHealing Opportunities Foundation CO Healing Opportunities — $270,000 · HealthSTROKE AWARENESS OREGON — $35,000 · HealthCOLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM — $250,000 · Arts & CultureMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $225,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,615,000Animals$750,000Education$580,000Human Services$475,000Health$305,000Arts & Culture$250,000Food & Nutrition$225,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $550,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetOregon State University Foundation — $500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHealing Opportunities Foundation CO Healing Opportunities — $270,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM — $250,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $225,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOREGON COAST AQUARIUM INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA CLARK COUNTY — $125,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARK ACADEMY — $75,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT ST HELENS INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISH — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOREGON TRAIL OF HOPE — $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSTROKE AWARENESS OREGON — $35,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetOUR HOUSE OF PORTLAND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREADING RESULTS — $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetThe Giving Closet — $25,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetEDWARDS CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGE US — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Autzen FoundationOR27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Wheeler Foundation · The Firstenburg Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Swigert Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ray Hickey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Edwards Center Inc79% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc24% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc20% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc14% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
  • Age Us6% of income from government
  • Columbia River Maritime Museum3% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph