· Private foundation
Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Islamic Medical Association of North America | $26,793 |
| FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL | $21,900 |
| ICNA | $20,000 |
| TCFUSA | $18,000 |
| SUIT NORTH AMERICA | $14,284 |
| ZAKATORG | $13,700 |
| CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA INC | $10,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| DAR-US-SAKINA | $10,000 |
| HIDAYA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CAIR | $10,000 |
| IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC | $10,000 |
| ISLAMIC RELIEF USA | $5,100 |
| AKHUWAT USA | $5,000 |
| LEAGUE CITY ISLAMIC CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SNSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +0%
- IKIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +29%
- CFCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I3× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- ASABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -9%
- SASHAHID AFRIDI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k
- HDHUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
Providing clean water to poor people living in Pakistan.
Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.
The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.
Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.
Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…
To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
Humanity first's mission is to relieve suffering caused by natural disasters or human conflict, promote peace and understanding, and strengthen people's capacity to help themselves.
To support charitable projects and programs in Pakistan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Citizens Foundation Usa and the most unlike its peers is Akhuwat Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
- Who funds DAR US SAKINA ↗
- Who funds HIDAYA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AKHUWAT USA ↗
- Who funds A CONTINUOUS CHARITY ↗
- Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds GIVE4NEEDY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds AN-NISA HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUMANITY AUXILIUM INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baker Hughes Foundation · Yaqub Family Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust · Islamic Relief USA
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.