Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of MAQSOOD A MALIK AND ABIDA M MALIK CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$200
Median grant
10
States reached
$268k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC$10,000
SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$3,000
FRIENDS OF ERWO$500
AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY HORN OF N AF$500
ZAYTUNA COLLEGE$250
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC$200
THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER$200
SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC$200
ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I$200
UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL$200
HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC$200
ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC$200
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$200
UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP$200
CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY HORN OF N AF: $500 → 7%CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $300 → 10%HIDAYA FOUNDATION: $300 → 8%ZAYTUNA COLLEGE: $500 → 10%SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $300 → 6%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250 → 17%FRIENDS OF ERWO: $1k → 5%ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 14%SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $300 → 16%UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP: $300 → 14%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC: $300 → 8%IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $10k → 11%ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I: $300 → 7%UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $300 → 8%THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER: $300 → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $300 → 9%AMERICAN RELIEF AGENCY HORN OF N AF: $300 → 7%CENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE: $200 → 10%HIDAYA FOUNDATION: $250 → 8%ZAYTUNA COLLEGE: $500 → 10%SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $100 → 6%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $200 → 17%FRIENDS OF ERWO: $500 → 5%ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC: $250 → 14%SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $250 → 16%UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP: $250 → 14%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC: $250 → 8%IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $10k → 11%ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I: $200 → 7%UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $250 → 8%THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER: $250 → 14%ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $100 → 9%HIDAYA FOUNDATION: $200 → 8%ZAYTUNA COLLEGE: $250 → 10%SAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%FRIENDS OF ERWO: $500 → 5%ISLAMIC SEMINARY FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 14%SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $200 → 16%UNITED MISSION FOR RELIEF DVLP: $200 → 14%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DVLP INC: $200 → 8%IMRAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $10k → 11%ISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSN OF N AMERICA I: $200 → 7%UMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL: $200 → 8%THE HUMAN DVLP FOUNDATION OF N AMER: $200 → 14%ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $300 → 14%ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52k · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$52k
$0

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPublic Safety & DisasterReligionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IK
    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +45%
  • ZC
    Zaytuna College Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • TI
    THE ISLAMIC SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $950 · revenue +6%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
    Education
    2
    International Institute of Islamic Medicine

    International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

    Human Services
    3
    Imamia Medics International Inc

    Medical research & community awareness. medical relief project in under- served regions. physician education & training.

    Philanthropy
    4
    Zakah Aid and Charity Assisting Humanity

    Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…

    Religion
    5
    Indo American Development and Health Organization
    International
    6
    Irusa Waqf

    Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.

    International
    7
    Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
    Education
    8
    Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

    Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

    Human Services
    9
    Indo-Us Foundation

    The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.

    Human Services
    10
    United Humanitarian Foundation

    To provide humanitarian relief and programs to help, assist, and empower citizens in their communities for sustainability and human development.

    Human Services
    11
    Zafar and Atia Incorporated

    The organization is working for raising funds for Koohi Goth Women Hospital, Malir University of Science and Technology, and related projects in Koohi Goth near Landhi Karachi. Pakistan.

    International
    12
    Hikmah Relief

    Hikmah relief is a non-profit corporation and operates exclusively for educational, humanitarian, and charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)3 of the internal revenue code, or the corresponding section of any future…

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Icna Relief Usa Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Siut North America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    12/12
    Grantees still filing
    9/12
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $30,000 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCSAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATION — $8,200 · OtherSAHARA FOR LIFE FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF ERWO — $2,000 · Other+6 more — $4,000 · Other+6 moreFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $950 · HealthSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC — $750 · HealthUMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL — $750 · InternationalCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE — $500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $450 · InternationalZaytuna College Inc — $1,250 · ReligionISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $700 · Public Safety & DisasterICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC — $400 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ISLAMIC SEMINARY OF AMERICA — $950 · EducationHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $750 · Philanthropy
    Other$44,200Health$1,700International$1,700Religion$1,250Public Safety & Disaster$1,100Education$950Philanthropy$750

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetZaytuna College Inc — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISLAMIC SEMINARY OF AMERICA — $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIDAYA FOUNDATION — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUMMAH RELIEF INTERNATIONAL — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ASIA INSTITUTE — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Rauf & Azeem Foundation IncTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc · Imami Family Foundation Inc · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Darul Sadaqa786 · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Good Planet Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Verizon Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Maqsood a Malik and Abida M Malik Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      2get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph