Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ranelletti Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$651kHuman Services$586kHousing & Shelter$150kPhilanthropy$134kYouth Development$95kHealth$45kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $172k
$6,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGSTON HIGH SCHOOL$40,000
HOLY TRINITY SCHOOL$30,000
HANFORD ROTARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$26,450
JACKS HELPING HAND$15,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY STRENGTHING$15,000
LUMINA ALLIANCE$15,000
FAMILY CARE NETWORK$10,932
ISTAR$10,000
PAULDING MIDDLE SCHOOL$10,000
HOME PLATE YOUTH SERVICES$7,500
ROSE HAVEN$6,500
JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM$6,000
BRADLEY ANGEL HOUSE$5,300
HOLY TRINITY CHURCH$5,000
NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ADELANTE MUJERES: $2k → 8%ADELANTE MUJERES: $2k → 8%ADELANTE MUJERES: $2k → 8%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $8k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $2k → 8%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $8k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $2k → 8%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $8k → 12%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $6k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $18k → 12%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $6k → 12%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $6k → 12%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAM: $6k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $15k → 12%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $15k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $15k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $15k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $15k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $11k → 12%STAND STRONG: $10k → 12%STAND STRONG: $10k → 12%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $10k → 12%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $10k → 12%STAND STRONG: $10k → 12%STAND STRONG: $9k → 12%JACKS HELPING HAND: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Ranelletti Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 61% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ranelletti Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 26 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
6

Total granted

$1.4M
$90k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CARE NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +20%
  • JH
    JACKS HELPING HAND INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $95k · revenue +143%
  • LA
    LUMINA ALLIANCE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $74k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • TM
    TEMPLETON MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • TE
    TEMPLETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE HOLY ROSARY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Family for Every Child

A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

Human Services
2
Human Services Network Dba Youth Services Network Inc

Our missions is to restore youth to lives of purpose, meaning and opportunity. human services network, dba youth services network (ysn), was founded in 1985. ysn operates three (3) community-based homes that serve boys from throughout los…

Health
3
Hillsides

We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…

Human Services
4
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
5
Youth Empowerment Siskiyou

The Agency advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children within the court system based on the belief that children are entitled to and have an inherent right to a safe and permanent home.The Agency began operating under…

Crime & Legal
6
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
7
Robynes Nest

Robynes Nest empowers at-risk and homeless high-school and transitional-age youth generally ages 14 to 24 who have little or no parental support by providing the resources stability and guidance needed to complete high school and pursue a…

Youth Development
8
Los Angeles Youth Network

Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…

Human Services
9
Youthcare

Youthcare works to end youth homelessness and to ensure that young people are valued for who they are and empowered to achieve their potential.

Human Services
10
Jovenes Inc

To facilitate the transition of homeless, at risk youth and the poor to establish stable grounds and become independent.

Human Services
11
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
12
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Janus Youth Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hanford Rotary Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOLY TRINITY SCHOOL — $217,400 · OtherHOLY TRINITY SCHOOLOCEAN VIEW SCHOOL — $130,000 · OtherOCEAN VIEW SCHOOLSHANDON SCHOOL DISTRICT — $120,000 · OtherSHANDON SCHOOL DISTRICTCENTER FOR FAMILY STRENGTHING — $113,000 · OtherCENTER FOR FAMILY STRENGTHINGFAMILY CARE NETWORK INC — $110,907 · OtherFAMILY CARE NETWORK INCISTAR — $76,700 · OtherISTARVINEYARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $56,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY CHURCH — $45,000 · OtherBRADLEY ANGEL HOUSE — $41,113 · Other+15 more — $298,480 · Other+15 moreJACKS HELPING HAND INC — $94,500 · Human ServicesJACKS HELPING HAND…LUMINA ALLIANCE — $74,000 · Human ServicesLUMINA ALLIANCEJANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $46,500 · Human ServicesJANUS YOUTH PROGRA…HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES — $37,000 · Human ServicesHOMEPLATE YOUTH SE…KINDRED MATTERS — $12,500 · Human Services+1 more — $9,000 · Human ServicesHANFORD ROTARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $133,545 · PhilanthropyROSE HAVEN CIC — $46,500 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGING VOICES — $22,000 · Arts & CultureTENNIS SERVES OTHERS — $9,600 · Community Improvement
Other$1,208,600Human Services$273,500Philanthropy$133,545Housing & Shelter$46,500Arts & Culture$22,000Community Improvement$9,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHANFORD ROTARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $133,545 over 7y, 34% of budgetFAMILY CARE NETWORK INC — $110,907 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJACKS HELPING HAND INC — $94,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetLUMINA ALLIANCE — $74,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC — $46,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetJANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC — $46,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES — $37,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $26,700 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBRIDGING VOICES — $22,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetKINDRED MATTERS — $12,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTENNIS SERVES OTHERS — $9,600 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HANFORD ROTARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY CARE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds JACKS HELPING HAND INC
  • Who funds LUMINA ALLIANCE
  • Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC
  • Who funds JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
  • Who funds HOMEPLATE YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC
  • Who funds BRIDGING VOICES
  • Who funds KINDRED MATTERS
  • Who funds TENNIS SERVES OTHERS
  • Who funds ADELANTE MUJERES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ranelletti Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 31%
  • Kindred Matters100% of income from government
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc46% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres31% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc20% of income from government
  • Homeplate Youth Services17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph