Skip to content

· Private foundation

Randall Noper Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$86kHuman Services$85kCommunity Improvement$50kPhilanthropy$40kReligion$33kYouth Development$18kHousing & Shelter$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$4,699
Median grant
2
States reached
$770k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHLAND COMMUNITY & TECH COLL FDN$10,000
Thief River Falls Education Foundation$10,000
HERTIAGE COMMUNITY CENTER$9,000
PEDER ENGELSTAD PIONEER VILLAGE$4,699
UNITED METHODISH CHURCH$4,550
BOY SCOUTS$1,000
GIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $340) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DISCOVERY PLACE: $340 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$308k · 11 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$308k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+17%

Still filing today

18%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HERITAGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +84% · 33% of their budget
  • EF
    Education Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $75k
  • NC
    NORTHLAND COMMUNITY & TECH COLL FDN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k

Funded once

  • VH
    Valley Home
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • PC
    Pennington County Humane Societygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +260%
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Knife River Heritage & Cultural Center
—
2
Dakota City Heritage Village Inc

Dchv connects modern generations to the past rural life & agricultural heritage in dakota cty through living history interpretation, education, & collection, preservation, & exhibition of information, objects & buildings.

Arts & Culture
3
Rock County Historical Society

To preserve the history of rock county, minnesota

—
4
Fall River County Historical Society

To preserve the early history of fall river county south dakota

—
5
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
6
Thompson Falls Pickleball Club
—
7
Wadena County Humane Society

We provide education on the responsible ownership of cats and dogs. we also strive to provide good homes for the homeless and abandoned animals.

Youth Development
8
Union County Historical Society

Preservation of union county iowa hisorical information and artifacts.

—
9
Kettle Falls Community Chest

Food is collected through donations and purchases, then distributed on an as needed basis.

—
10
Hibbing Animal Shelter aka Precious Paws Humane Society

To provide temporary board and care of animals

Animals
11
Devils Lake Rural Fire Dept Inc

Fire Department

—
12
Seward County Historical Society Seward County Historical

Provide and showcase historical information about Seward County.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thief River Falls Area Food Shelf; the most unlike its peers is Pennington County Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Education Foundation: $75,189 · OtherEducation FoundationNORTHLAND COMMUNITY & TECH COLL FDN: $50,000 · OtherNORTHLAND COMMUNITY & TECH COLL FDNNCTC Foundation: $40,000 · OtherNCTC FoundationUNITED METHODISH CHURCH: $31,300 · OtherUNITED METHODISH CHURCHPEDER ENGELSTAD PIONEER VILLAGE: $11,036 · OtherValley Home: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $20,988 · Other+10 moreHERITAGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $79,814 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE COMMUNITY CENTER …THIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationGIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentPennington County Humane Society: $5,704 · AnimalsVIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROJECT: $1,735 · Crime & LegalTHIEF RIVER FALLS AREA FOOD SHELF: $1,337 · Food & Nutrition
Other$238,513Arts & Culture$79,814Education$10,000Youth Development$7,000Animals$5,704Crime & Legal$1,735Food & Nutrition$1,337

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHERITAGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $79,814 over 9y, 33% of budgetTHIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPennington County Humane Society: $5,704 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROJECT: $1,735 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHIEF RIVER FALLS AREA FOOD SHELF: $1,337 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC: $1,337 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPennington County Historical Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Discovery Place: $340 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HERITAGE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THIEF RIVER FALLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds Pennington County Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THIEF RIVER FALLS AREA FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Pennington County Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Discovery Place ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartz FoundationMN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartz Foundation · Northwest Minnesota Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Randall Noper Char Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Randall Noper Char Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Randall Noper Char Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph