Skip to content
Randall a Wolf Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Randall a Wolf Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$205k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.5MEducation$1.4MHousing & Shelter$630kHealth$559kYouth Development$538kFood & Nutrition$250kHuman Services$250kRecreation & Sports$223kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $986k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SAN BENITO COUNTY$205,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$200,000
CAMP VIA WEST$200,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$100,000
SHEPHERD'S GATE$80,000
JACOBS HEART$51,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$50,000
LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN$50,000
HOPE'S CORNER$50,000
FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING$30,000
ONE COMMUNITY CAMPAIGN$22,500
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$15,000
UN MUNDO$15,000
SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS (SAVE)$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $440k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PATRIOT PAWS: $25k → 5%MY NEW RED SHOES: $30k → 7%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS (SAVE): $15k → 10%GATEWAY CENTER OF MONTEREY: $150k → 12%PATRIOT PAWS: $10k → 5%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS (SAVE): $10k → 10%PATRIOT PAWS: $5k → 5%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $30k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $30k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $30k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $30k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $30k → 8%MARTHAS KITCHEN: $10k → 8%MARTHAS KITCHEN: $10k → 8%MARTHAS KITCHEN: $10k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 45% of Randall a Wolf Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 93%.

Randall a Wolf Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 29 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
22

Total granted

$2.4M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+23%

Still filing today

55%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $801k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $575k · revenue +124%
  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +8%
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES - SHUMAN HEART HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +64%
  • GC
    GATEWAY CENTER OF MONTEREY COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
8
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
9
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
10
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
Tipping Point Community

We build community to advance the most promising poverty-fighting solutions.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gateway Center of Monterey County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Truebeck Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
30/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SAN BENITO COUNTY: $3,456,361 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SAN BENITO COUNTY+3 more: $58,500 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA: $280,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CA…COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES - SHUMAN HEART HOUSE: $250,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES - S…BELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $225,000 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATO…JACOBS HEART: $181,000 · OtherJACOBS HEARTCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION (CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL): $100,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES: $100,000 · OtherSTANFORD STROKE CENTER: $75,000 · OtherVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $150,000 · OtherVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER O…Junior Achievement of Northern California: $100,000 · OtherShepherds Gate: $80,000 · Other+27 more: $470,119 · Other+27 moreEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $575,000 · EducationEASTSIDE CO…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationTHE BOARD O…READING PARTNERS: $55,000 · EducationREADING PAR…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+3 more: $14,600 · EducationFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY CENTER OF MONTEREY COUNTY INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $40,000 · Human ServicesMBOLDEN CHANGE: $30,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesSafe Alternatives To Violent Environments: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $16,500 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $200,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentVIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $200,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $150,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $25,000 · Health+2 more: $12,500 · HealthSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $50,000 · Food & NutritionHopes Corner Inc: $50,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMATTHEW'S CROSSING: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSAN BENITO COUNTY SADDLE HORSE ASSOC: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$3,514,861Other$2,011,119Education$774,600Human Services$466,500Youth Development$465,000Health$417,500Food & Nutrition$215,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SAN BENITO COUNTY: $3,456,361 over 3y, 20% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $575,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $250,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetVIA REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $200,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC: $150,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGATEWAY CENTER OF MONTEREY COUNTY INC: $150,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $150,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern California: $100,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetShepherds Gate: $80,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBenitoLink Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHopes Corner Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRATITUDE GLOBAL: $30,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMBOLDEN CHANGE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Alternatives To Violent Environments: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATTHEW'S CROSSING: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUn Mundo: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetSAN BENITO COUNTY SADDLE HORSE ASSOC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIUCCI FAMILY FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOS GATOS UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHollister Downtown Association: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNRAVEL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetACE Mentor San Francisco Bay Area Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohlone Humane Society Inc: $1,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTruebeck Foundation: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The Sobrato Family Fo…The Intuit FoundationBright Funds Foundati…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Leo M Shortino Family…San Jose Mercury News…East Bay Community Fo…United Way of the Bay…The David and Lucile …The San Francisco Fou…The Brandenburg Famil…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA24.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Leo M Shortino Family Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Brandenburg Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Randall a Wolf Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Randall a Wolf Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Randall a Wolf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home