Loading…
· Private foundation
RANCHO FEEDWELL FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$55k
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
3
Communities
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of RANCHO FEEDWELL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
food bankjewishknpr
2021
veterans
2022
squarejewish warveterans
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$935k
Total assets
Largest grants
- TEMPLE BETH TORAH$20,000
- CITY OF OASIS CHURCH$5,000
- LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC$5,000
- ISLAND HARVEST$5,000
- THE FRANKLIN ANGUS FUND$4,000
- SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$3,000
- NO MATTER WHAT FOUNDATION INC$3,000
- MERCY SOUP KITCHEN$3,000
- DUPUYTREN RESEARCH FOUNDATION$3,000
- LONG ISLAND CARES INC$3,000
- LAS VEGAS PBS$500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$154k · 15 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else
15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
15
13
Total granted
$154k
$56k
Still filing today
33%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionInternationalCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHIAS2× · 2021–2022 · $14k · revenue +191%
- GOGREEN OUR PLANET3× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +238%
- HMHUI MALAMA I KE ALA ULILI2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +543%
Funded once
- FBFOOD BANK OF NORTH NVone grant, 2020 · $8k
- 3S3 SQUARE FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · $8k
- FBFOOD BANK OF NOTHERN NEVADAone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Health and Welfare Council
Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them
Health
2
East End Food Institute
East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…
Food & Nutrition
3
Long Island Housing Partnership Inc
To provide affordable housing opportunities on long island, for those unable to afford homes, through development, technical assistance, mortgage counseling, homebuyer and fair housing education and lending programs.
Housing & Shelter
4
Island Grown Initiative Ltd
Island grown initiative (igi) is a nonprofit that works to build a regenerative and equitable food system on marthas vineyard. we envision an island food system that strengthens the relationship between people and the land and sea,…
Food & Nutrition
5
Havens Harvest Inc
Our mission is to build community and reduce food waste, one food rescue at a time. We recover food that is too good to waste. It is a hyper local, volunteer driven organization that uses technology to best support the community to recover…
Environment
6
Hui Malama Ola Na Oiwi
Hui malama ola na 'oiwi is a community-based native hawaiian health care system whose mission is to improve the provision of comprehensive disease prevention, health promotion, and primary care services on hawaii island.
—
7
Harvest Against Hunger
To help feed hungry people with surplus nutritious produce.
—
8
Hunger Ends Here
Estabilished in 2012, harvest pack is a non-profit organization committed to bringing food to those in need, with the help of people who care. we envision a world where healthy food is accessible to everyone.
Food & Nutrition
9
Hui Hoolana
Create a self-sustaining facility that supports educational programs and native hawaiian reforestation projects.
Arts & Culture
10
Island Institute
We boldly navigate climate and economic change with island and coastal communities to expand opportunities and deliver solutions.
Education
11
Long Island Housing Services Inc
The elimination of unlawful housing discrimination and promotion of decent and affordable housing through advocacy and education.
Housing & Shelter
12
Harvest in the Gardens Inc
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Island Harvest Ltd and the most unlike its peers is Hias Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$191,000Human Services$16,000Food & Nutrition$14,500International$14,000Environment$12,000Community Improvement$10,000Health$6,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RANCHO FEEDWELL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NO MATTER WHAT FOUNDATION INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 1355.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 934693628 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NO MATTER WHAT FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Rancho Feedwell Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rancho Feedwell Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines