Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ran & Carol Ricks Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2021
5
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Youth Development$70kHuman Services$33kHealth$21kCommunity Improvement$15kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIVOT INC$50,000
SMART START OF CENTRAL OK$10,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$5,000
PEPPERS RANCH$5,000
SPECIAL CARE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PEPPERS RANCH: $10k → 12%PEPPERS RANCH: $10k → 12%CITY CARE: $3k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH: $5k → 12%PEPPERS RANCH: $5k → 12%PIVOT INC: $50k → 16%PIVOT INC: $10k → 16%PIVOT INC: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 6 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$137k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+82%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PIVOT INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $70k · revenue +227%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +82%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +26%
  • CC
    CITY CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +82%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
2
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

Education
3
Precious Kids Center

Located in kitale, kenya, the precious kids center ("pkc") serves children with disabilities to provide the support they need to learn, grow, and reach their full potential. each child is cared for according to their individual needs.…

International
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
5
The Children's Home of Pittsburgh

The children's home of pittsburgh, established in 1893, is an independent, non-profit licensed organization whose purpose is to promote the health and well-being of infants and children through services which establish and strengthen the…

Health
6
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
7
Peaceful Family Solutions Inc

Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…

Human Services
8
New Hope Oklahoma Inc

New hope teaches children of prisoners to become positive, productive, contributing members of society. we do this by providing after school programs, weekend retreats, holiday parties and summer camps to children who have or have had a…

Youth Development
9
Cornerstones of Care

Partnering for safe and healthy communities.

Human Services
10
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
11
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
12
Oklahoma Children & Youth Coalition

Oklahoma children and youth coalition, inc. was established in 2012 to create programs and projects for children, youth and their families and those who support them. we worect to mental health, social and intellectual development, and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIVOT INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCPEPPERS RANCH INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH INCSPECIAL CARE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesSMART START OF CENTRAL OK: $15,000 · OtherSMART START O…SMILE TRAIN INC: $2,300 · OtherSMILE TRAIN I…Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual gr…OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $10,000 · HealthOKLAHOMA P…American Heart Association Inc: $3,500 · HealthAmerican H…POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Human Services$107,500Other$18,300Health$13,500Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPIVOT INC: $70,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $30,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Aaron & Gertrude Karchmer Memorial Foundation · Wilshire Charitable Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ran & Carol Ricks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ran & Carol Ricks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ran & Carol Ricks Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph