Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ram & Mithlesh Gupta Family Foundation

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$105kReligion$100kInternational$50kScience & Tech$40kEducation$23kArts & Culture$16kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IIT DELHI ENDOWMENT FUND$40,000
SEWA INTL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
DHARMESH FOUNDATION$5,000
VHPA$2,500
INDIA DISCOVERY CENTER$1,500
AKSHAY PATRA$500
HUA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%SEWA INTL: $10k → 16%INFINITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 4 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +148% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$165k
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+148%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VI
    VISION-AID INCORPORATED
    3× · 2021–2023 · $95k · revenue +148%
  • SI
    Sewa International Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +33%
  • H
    HUA
    2× · 2021–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • HU
    Hindu University of Americagraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $90k · revenue +57%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +6%
  • F
    FOLK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indo-Us Foundation

The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.

Human Services
2
International Foundation for Social Impact Inc

To promote education in the field of medical, engineering, management, computer software, hardware and information technology by establishing school, college, institution and education and research centre for upliftment of society, with a…

Education
3
India Foundation

Healthcare and education for the needy

Human Services
4
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
5
Iisc Foundation

The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…

Education
6
Vedanta Charitable Foundation
Education
7
Iit (Bhu) Foundation Inc

The foundation is a u.s. "friends of" entity formed by individuals who wish to advance and support the work of the indian institute of technology (banaras hindu university, "iit (bhu)"), a public technical and research university located…

Education
8
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
9
Iit Roorkee Foundation Inc

Receives donation for funding & establishing scholarships,promoting reserch & development, ecxellence in education, teaching & other related tax exempt activities

Philanthropy
10
Indo American Development and Health Organization
International
11
Vidyadhara Foundation

Provide no cost education or facilitate by lending funds to other non profits and deserving students,teachers and schools in underserved communities to underserved and remote villages and locations where Governments cannot offer tuition or…

Education
12
Vedic Education and Devotional Academy

To impart hindu vedic education which is the study of ancient sanskrit scriptures to those who are interested, and to provide a place of worship to hindu religion followers.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Infinity Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hindu University of America: $90,000 · OtherHindu University of AmericaHUA: $15,100 · OtherHUAFOLK: $10,000 · OtherFOLKCHIPIN: $10,000 · OtherCHIPINCHIP: $10,000 · OtherCHIPCHILDREN'S OWN SCHOOL INC: $6,700 · Other+11 more: $32,800 · Other+11 moreVISION-AID INCORPORATED: $94,500 · HealthVISION-AID INCORPORATEDSewa International Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesSewa Internationa…INFINITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesINFINITY FOUNDATI…IIT DELHI ENDOWMENT FUND US: $40,000 · EducationIIT DELHI E…EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10,950 · InternationalBOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · InternationalHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,011 · Arts & Culture
Other$174,600Health$94,500Human Services$60,000Education$40,000International$15,950Arts & Culture$1,011

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVISION-AID INCORPORATED: $94,500 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetHindu University of America: $90,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetSewa International Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetIIT DELHI ENDOWMENT FUND US: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFINITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S OWN SCHOOL INC: $6,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VISION-AID INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Hindu University of America ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds IIT DELHI ENDOWMENT FUND US ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds INFINITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S OWN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON CARDIAC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH IS WEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ram & Mithlesh Gupta Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ram & Mithlesh Gupta Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ram & Mithlesh Gupta Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ram & Mithlesh Gupta Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ram & Mithlesh Gupta Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph