Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph H Foss Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$182kReligion$850Arts & Culture$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,840
Median grant
7
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYBOZEMAN$8,360
DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY$3,680
MONTANA TECH UNIVERSITY$2,840
NORTHWEST COLLEGE$1,840
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$1,840
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA$1,840
UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE$1,000
WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY$1,000
MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY$840
UNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN$840
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$840
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MSU-BILLINGS: $750 → 9%GLENDIVE RANGER REVIEW: $132 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE: $1k → 14%MONTANA TECH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $750 → 9%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN: $840 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $2k → 13%NORTHWEST COLLEGE: $2k → 11%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $840 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
ND
MN
WI
NY
WY
SD
IA
UT
CO
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$152k · 24 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$152k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+32%

Still filing today

29%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DORDT UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +50%
  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +21%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
12
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYBOZEMAN: $45,345 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYBOZEMANDICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $18,287 · OtherDICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITYBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,807 · OtherBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITYMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $9,304 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY+33 more: $63,889 · Other+33 moreDORDT UNIVERSITY: $7,051 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITYNew York University: $6,881 · EducationNew York UniversityUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $6,381 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERUniversity of Jamestown: $3,805 · EducationUniversity of Jamest…University of Mary: $3,000 · EducationUniversity of MarySEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $2,850 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIV…+3 more: $2,700 · Education+3 more
Other$150,632Education$32,668

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $7,051 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $6,881 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $6,381 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Jamestown: $3,805 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $2,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $2,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARANATHA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY INC: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds University of Jamestown ↗
  • Who funds University of Mary ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds MARANATHA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Darcy Lynn Dengel Foundation IncMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Darcy Lynn Dengel Foundation Inc · The Leonard Rydell Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph H Foss Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph H Foss Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ralph H Foss Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph