Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ralph H Foss Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$182kReligion$850Arts & Culture$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,840
Median grant
7
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYBOZEMAN$8,360
DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY$3,680
MONTANA TECH UNIVERSITY$2,840
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$1,840
NORTHWEST COLLEGE$1,840
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA$1,840
MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN$840
BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY$840
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$840
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MSU-BILLINGS: $750 → 9%GLENDIVE RANGER REVIEW: $132 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE: $1k → 14%MONTANA TECH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $750 → 9%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%MINOT STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN: $840 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $2k → 13%NORTHWEST COLLEGE: $2k → 11%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $840 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
ND
MN
WI
NY
WY
SD
IA
UT
CO
KS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$152k · 24 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$152k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+32%

Still filing today

29%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DORDT UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +50%
  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +21%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

12
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYBOZEMAN — $45,345 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYBOZEMANDICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY — $18,287 · OtherDICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITYBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY — $13,807 · OtherBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITYMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY — $9,304 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY+33 more — $63,889 · Other+33 moreDORDT UNIVERSITY — $7,051 · EducationDORDT UNIVERSITYNew York University — $6,881 · EducationNew York UniversityUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $6,381 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERUniversity of Jamestown — $3,805 · EducationUniversity of Jamest…University of Mary — $3,000 · EducationUniversity of MarySEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $2,850 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIV…+3 more — $2,700 · Education+3 more
Other$150,632Education$32,668

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY — $7,051 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $6,881 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $6,381 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Jamestown — $3,805 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mary — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $2,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION — $2,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARANATHA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY INC — $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE — $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University — $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • Who funds University of Jamestown
  • Who funds University of Mary
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE
  • Who funds MARANATHA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Darcy Lynn Dengel Foundation IncMT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Darcy Lynn Dengel Foundation Inc · The Leonard Rydell Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ralph H Foss Memorial Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph