Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph and Lucille Schey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$788kHuman Services$305kEducation$163kPublic Safety & Disaster$157kHealth$127kReligion$90kRecreation & Sports$58kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$11,137
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Cleveland Orchestra$38,000
Playhouse Square Foundation$26,000
American Red Cross$20,000
The 249th Engineer Battalion Association$11,137
St Christopher By-The-River$10,000
American Cancer Society$10,000
Serbian Cultural Garden$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cleveland Sight Center: $22k → 17%Cleveland Sight Center: $13k → 17%Cleveland Sight Center: $3k → 17%Cleveland Sight Center: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IA
OH
PA
VA
MD
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
22

Total granted

$1.5M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    7× · 2018–2025 · $671k · revenue +27%
  • PS
    Playhouse Square Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $99k · revenue +31%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2022–2025 · $92k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • GS
    Georgia State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +77%
  • NO
    NORTHEAST OHIO CURLING CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -56%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
2
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
3
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
11
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
12
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Society for the Blind; the most unlike its peers is Elizabethtown College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Musical Arts Association: $671,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts AssociationPlayhouse Square Foundation: $99,000 · Arts & CulturePlayhouse Square Foundation+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCleveland Play House Foundation: $295,000 · OtherCleveland Play House FoundationAmerican Red Cross: $51,950 · OtherAmerican Red CrossSt Christopher By-The-River: $50,000 · OtherSt Christopher By-The-RiverIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherSt Christopher's: $20,150 · OtherSt Christophers By-The-River: $20,000 · OtherBloomsburg University: $20,000 · Other+14 more: $69,137 · Other+14 moreGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $100,000 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationCLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $6,000 · EducationURSINUS COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $92,310 · Human ServicesCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $39,038 · Human ServicesTHE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER: $51,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 · Health+2 more: $1,600 · HealthNORTHEAST OHIO CURLING CLUB: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsOhio Girls Golf Foundation: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsLAKE VERMILION FIRE BRIGADE: $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $1,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$772,000Other$547,237Education$133,000Human Services$131,348Health$87,600Recreation & Sports$56,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,500Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $671,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation: $99,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $92,310 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER: $51,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO CURLING CLUB: $50,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $39,038 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Girls Golf Foundation: $6,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetURSINUS COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE VERMILION FIRE BRIGADE: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BARGAIN BOX: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Playhouse Square Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO CURLING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Girls Golf Foundation ↗
  • Who funds URSINUS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND BALLET ↗
  • Who funds LAKE VERMILION FIRE BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds THE BARGAIN BOX ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph and Lucille Schey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph and Lucille Schey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ralph and Lucille Schey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph