Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rainbow Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$801k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Education$1.1MReligion$129kHuman Services$45kScience & Tech$10kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $274k
  • $250k+1 grant · $801k
$90,037
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALVIN COLLEGE$801,032
CAMP ROGER$101,082
KALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$90,037
GRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$83,056
SAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES$25,021
WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES: $25k → 11%WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 5 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.0M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+83%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $274k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $916k · revenue +6%
  • LC
    LUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $28k · revenue +47%
  • KC
    KALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $23k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • OU
    Opportunities Unlimited for the Blind Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +83%
  • SL
    SPECIALIZED LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -32%
  • GH
    Grand Haven Christian Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +502%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grandville Calvin Christian Schools

Equipping students to serve and glorify God. GCCS offers a Christ-centered education that is grounded in faith, connected through relationships, committed to excellence and prepared for service.

Education
2
Great Lakes Bible College

Great lakes christian college, an institution of higher education affiliated with christian churches/churches of christ, seeks to glorify god by preparing students to be servant-leaders in the church and world.

Education
3
Calvin Christian School of Minneapolis

Avail provides quality K-12 education, which integrates a Christian worldview in supporting parents and partnering with churches to nurture students as disciples of Christ

4
Catholic Biblical School of Michigan Ltd

The school provides scripture classes from a Roman Catholic prospective.

5
Lakeview Christian Academy Inc

To partner with christian parents to "train young champions for christ - spiritually, academically, socially, emotionally, and physically."

6
Lakeland Christian Academy Association Inc

The organization exists to provide a biblically centered educational environment so that its students may be equipped to become christ honoring members of their families, churches, and communities.

Education
7
Calvary Christian Schools

Provide an exemplary christ-centered education equipping students with truths, knowledge, skills and values that advance the pursuit of god's purpose for their lives.

Education
8
Christian Heritage School of Longview

To provide excellence in classical christ-centered education, working together with the students' homes, in order to develop within each student the ability to reason biblically while encouraging a desire to savor god and to serve both god…

Education
9
Columbia Christian Schools

Columbia christian schools seeks to provide a christ-centered education focused on excellence in faith, character and academics to students in preschool through 12th grade.

10
Calvary Baptist School of Lansdale

Calvary baptist school exists to educate students with a biblical worldview and support families as they train up their children in truth, all to the glory of god.

Education
11
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
12
Christian School Association of Ann Arbor

The Christian School Association of Ann Arbor, dba Ann Arbor Christian School, provides Preschool through 10th grade education with a Christian focus to approximately 264 students.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Rapids Christian Schools and the most unlike its peers is Specialized Language Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALVIN UNIVERSITY — $915,757 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSITYGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $83,056 · EducationGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS+2 more — $26,275 · EducationKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $90,037 · OtherKALAMAZOO…BIOLOGOS — $17,000 · OtherBIOLOGOS+1 more — $2,500 · OtherCAMP ROGER — $101,082 · Recreation & SportsCAMP ROGE…Opportunities Unlimited for the Blind Inc — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC — $45,021 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC — $28,000 · Human ServicesSPECIALIZED LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $5,000 · Health
Education$1,025,088Other$109,537Recreation & Sports$106,082Housing & Shelter$45,021Human Services$28,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY — $915,757 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP ROGER — $101,082 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $83,056 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MINISTRIES INC — $45,021 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetLUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC — $28,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKALAMAZOO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $23,275 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIALIZED LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGrand Haven Christian School — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Samuel L Westerman Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rainbow Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph