Skip to content
Radio Training Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Radio Training Network Inc

To share the unchanging gospel of jesus christ with as many people as possible in a relational way through relevant media.

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$467kHuman Services$138kReligion$93kInternational$87kHealth$72kFood & Nutrition$42kPhilanthropy$42kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $104,775, the rows itemized in this filing. The $121,064 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,289 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $100k
$35,331
Median grant
4
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONVOY OF HOPE$46,444
HOPE FOR JUSTICE$35,331
FINANCIAL PLANNING MINISTRY$18,000
HOPE MEDIA GROUP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE FOR JUSTICE INC: $43k → 14%HEART FOR LEBANON FOUNDATION: $34k → 12%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $35k → 14%HEART FOR LEBANON FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%HOPE FOR JUSTICE INC: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
MO
TN
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$252k · 4 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$252k
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+54%

Still filing today

75%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Hope for Justice Inc
    3× · 2019–2024 · $87k · revenue +81%
  • FP
    FINANCIAL PLANNING MINISTRY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $72k · revenue +37%
  • HF
    Heart for Lebanon Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $43k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE
    one grant, 2023 · $51k · revenue +10%
  • TW
    TRANS WORLD RADIO
    one grant, 2018 · $45k
  • LA
    LOVE A CHILD INC
    one grant, 2020 · $42k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
2
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
3
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
4
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
5
Hope Worldwide Ltd

Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.

International
6
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
7
Pilgrim Africa

Pilgrim Africa's mission is to challenge despair, love boldly, and help African people create a future of sustainable prosperity and health. We give ourselves in service to others regardless of economic, religious, or social standing,…

International
8
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
9
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
10
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
11
Fountains of Hope International Inc

Fountains of Hope is committed to serving God by providing safe water and community needs in developing countries and in disaster relief areas worldwide.

International
12
Hope Ministries of Baton Rouge

Prevent homelessness. promote self-sufficiency and dignity.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONVOY OF HOPE: $466,761 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPELOVE A CHILD INC: $42,232 · InternationalLOVE A CHILD INCSET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE): $38,512 · InternationalSET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE)+1 more: $6,148 · InternationalHope for Justice Inc: $87,321 · Human ServicesHope for Justice IncSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $51,008 · Human ServicesSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC …Heart for Lebanon Foundation: $42,992 · Human ServicesHeart for Lebanon Fou…MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $7,827 · Human ServicesOTHERS: $49,739 · OtherOTHERSTRANS WORLD RADIO: $45,440 · OtherTRANS WORL…FINANCIAL PLANNING MINISTRY: $72,000 · HealthFeeding America: $41,604 · Food & NutritionTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $41,552 · PhilanthropyHOPE MEDIA GROUP: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
International$553,653Human Services$189,148Other$95,179Health$72,000Food & Nutrition$41,604Philanthropy$41,552Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $466,761 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHope for Justice Inc: $87,321 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFINANCIAL PLANNING MINISTRY: $72,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $51,008 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHeart for Lebanon Foundation: $42,992 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLOVE A CHILD INC: $42,232 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $41,604 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $41,552 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSET FREE ALLIANCE (F/K/A WATER OF LIFE): $38,512 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $7,827 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZoe Empowers: $6,148 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE MEDIA GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationChristian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…Texas Instruments Fou…The US Charitable Gif…The Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…Verizon FoundationNational Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…
Servant FoundationKS18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Radio Training Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Radio Training Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Love a Child Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Radio Training Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home