Skip to content

· Private foundation

RAD Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$68kHealth$24kArts & Culture$21kEducation$11kEnvironment$10kAnimals$10kCommunity Improvement$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Caring Paws Rescue$10,000
Easter Seals Washington$10,000
Buena Vista Regional Medical Center$8,588
Buena Vista Co Historical Society$7,500
Friends of Storm Lake Public Library$7,500
Plains Area Mental Health$5,000
Willamette Partnership$5,000
Island Shakespeare Festival$5,000
Old Mill Center for Children and Families$5,000
Green Belt Land Trust$5,000
Ida Grove Kiwanis Foundation$4,500
United Methodist Church$3,500
Storm Lake Police Dept$2,500
Storm Lake Music Boosters$2,500
Buena Vista Co Sheriff Dept$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Old Mill Center for Children and Families: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 15 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$94k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+38%

Still filing today

20%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    United Methodist Church
    8× · 2017–2025 · $63k
  • BV
    BUENA VISTA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $9k
  • SL
    Storm Lake Music Boosters
    8× · 2017–2025 · $5k

Funded once

  • IG
    Ida Grove Economic Development (Afghan Refugee Program)
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k
  • HH
    Hope Haven FBO Faith Hope & Charity
    4× · 2020–2024 · $500
  • IT
    Imagine the Possibilitiesgraduated
    4× · 2020–2024 · $250 · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc

Strength in every struggle and hope in every heart.

Health
2
Disability Rights Iowa

To advance through all resources the human and legal rights of individuals with disabilities. disability rights iowa provides free legal and non-legal advocacy assistance to persons with mental illness, disabilities and certain social…

—
3
The Gulf Coast Center

Gulf Coast Center provides accessible efficient and quality services to support the independent and healthy living of those we serve. Every day our counselors therapists psychiatrists case workers peers support and administrative staff…

Health
4
Greater Des Moines Partnership Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Hope Clinical Care

Provide clinical and educational service and support to individuals with autism and related disorders.

Health
6
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
7
Washburn Center for Children

Washburn Center for Children diagnose and treats children in their social, emotional or behavioral development so that they grow into their full potential through therapeutic and healing services that includes their families in a setting…

Health
8
Opportunities Unlimited Inc

A nonprofit organized for the purpose of providing evaluation, training, employment, education, placement and support services to individuals with emotional, physical and developmental disabilities, including people with severe…

Employment
9
The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health
10
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
11
Orchard Place

Our mission at orchard place is "developing strong futures" for the children and youth of iowa. we do this by providing a continuum of services to our clients who deal with mental and behavioral health challenges.

Health
12
The Arc of Spokane

We promote independence and choice and enhance the quality of life for people with developmental disabilities and their families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upper Des Moines Opportunity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Buena Vista County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Methodist Church: $63,000 · OtherUnited Methodist ChurchCARING PAWS RESCUE: $10,000 · OtherCARING PAWS RESCUEBUENA VISTA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,800 · OtherBUENA VISTA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYBuena Vista Regional Medical Center: $8,588 · OtherBuena Vista Regional Medical CenterFriends of Storm Lake Public Library: $7,500 · OtherFriends of Storm Lake Public LibraryPLAINS AREA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER I: $5,000 · OtherIda Grove Economic Development (Afghan Refugee Program): $5,000 · OtherStorm Lake Music Boosters: $4,800 · Other+17 more: $27,200 · Other+17 moreEaster Seals Washington: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthGREENBELT LAND TRUST: $5,000 · EnvironmentWILLAMETTE PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 · EnvironmentOLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesISLAND SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBuena Vista University: $1,100 · EducationYale University: $500 · EducationUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $150 · Community Improvement
Other$139,888Health$10,100Environment$10,000Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000Education$1,600Community Improvement$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUENA VISTA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,800 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetOLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENBELT LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLAMETTE PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAINS AREA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER I: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBuena Vista University: $1,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGENESIS DEVELOPMENT: $850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetImagine the Possibilities: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Easter Seals Washington ↗
  • Who funds BUENA VISTA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBELT LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds PLAINS AREA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER I ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Imagine the Possibilities ↗
  • Who funds UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization RAD Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from RAD Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Willamette Partnership: 84% of income from government
  • Old Mill Center for Children and Families Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Greenbelt Land Trust: 10% of income from government
  • Yale University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on RAD’s filings →

More from the funding graph