· Public charity
Rad-Aid International Inc
To improve and optimize access to medical imaging and radiology in low resource regions of the world for increasing radiology's contribution to global public health initiatives and patient care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $1,863,803 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,946,346 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,082,543 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $593k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | $413,887 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS | $413,210 |
| ALABAMA REGIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES | $412,264 |
| LONE STAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $214,225 |
| SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS | $200,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CANCER CENTER | $179,000 |
| BELLIN COLLEGE | $16,217 |
| JACKSON PARK HOSPITAL | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $3.0M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $3.0M to organizations and $30k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM + HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDICAL IMAGING- GHANA · RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM + HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDICAL IMAGING- KENYA · RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM- MALAWI
Stated purpose: RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM- GUYANA · RAD-AID GLOBAL HEALTH RADIOLOGY TRAINING GRANT
Stated purpose: RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM- GRENADA
Stated purpose: WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE MOBILE OUTREACH PROGRAM- INDIA
Stated purpose: HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDICAL IMAGING FOR UKRAINE
Stated purpose: RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM- INDONESIA · RAD-AID TELE-ULTRASOUND PROGRAM- LAOS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $644k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DHDenver Health and Hospital Authority2× · 2020–2024 · $806k
- JPJACKSON PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2024 · $571k · revenue -15%
- ARALABAMA REGIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES2× · 2022–2024 · $523k · revenue -21%
Funded once
- NYNEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINEone grant, 2021 · $500k
- AMAU MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC2× · 2021–2022 · $497k · revenue -84%
- MPMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2021 · $413k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lone Star Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JACKSON PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA REGIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AU MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds BREAST CARE FOR WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds WELLSTAR MCG HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LONE STAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
- Who funds BELLIN COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds UTMB HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rad-Aid International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rad-Aid International Inc?
Find your warmest path to Rad-Aid International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.