Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rachesky Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$48kHuman Services$34kPhilanthropy$22kReligion$22kFood & Nutrition$18kArts & Culture$2kCivil Rights$2kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$491k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION$14,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $3k → 17%DOROT INC: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
WI
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$108k · 61 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

61 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
45

Total granted

$108k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+40%

Still filing today

28%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VALLEY HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +26%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOME AT ROCKLEIGH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $24k · revenue +32%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $400 · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • JH
    JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • PB
    PALM BEACH FREINDS OF MAGDE DAVO ADOM
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • JB
    JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
10
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
11
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
12
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chadwick Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Fallen First Responder Supp…Child and Family ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Education Equity LeadershipFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Veteran Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Senior LivingJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%56%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE VALLEY HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL INCJEWISH HOME AT ROCKLEIGH — $23,600 · HealthJEWISH HOME AT ROCKLEIGHBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $14,000 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc+10 more — $2,300 · HealthJEWISH FED OF PALM BEACH — $18,000 · OtherJEWISH FED OF PALM BEACHTEMPLE SINAI — $13,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAIJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherJEWISH HOME FOUNDATIONPALM BEACH FREINDS OF MAGDE DAVO ADOM — $2,500 · Other+79 more — $26,089 · Other+79 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATIO…CHADWICK FOUNDATION — $4,000 · PhilanthropyCHADWICK FOUNDAT…+2 more — $300 · PhilanthropyJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $400 · Human Services+2 more — $200 · Human ServicesDWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL — $700 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $200 · EducationOPERATION SMILE INC — $400 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $300 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $400 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute — $300 · Public Benefit
Health$64,900Other$64,589Philanthropy$22,300Human Services$3,100Education$900International$700Public Benefit$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME AT ROCKLEIGH — $23,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADWICK FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST POINT JEWISH CHAPEL FUND — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION TO SALUTE AMERICA'S HEROES FOUNDATION — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SILVER SHIELD FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Medical Center — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME AT ROCKLEIGH
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc
  • Who funds CHADWICK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC
  • Who funds DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rachesky Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Valley Hospital Inc1% of income from government
  • Mercy Medical Center0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph