Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ra Hunsdorfer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$316kReligion$119kHuman Services$60kPublic Benefit$36kHealth$29kEnvironment$28kRecreation & Sports$19kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY$50,000
CAPITAL CITY RESCUE MISSION$14,500
KNICKERBOCKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$6,500
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
SAMARITAN PURSE$4,600
WMHT$4,500
THE SMILE TRAIN-CLEFT SURGERY$3,500
REGIONAL FOOD BANK$3,000
MOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANCY$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$1,000
BOYS TOWN$500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$500
COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $300 → 12%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $500 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $500 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $500 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $500 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $500 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $300 → 14%NORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLI: $800 → 14%NORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLI: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$654k · 34 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
2

Total granted

$654k
$3k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +15%
  • SI
    STRIDE Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k · revenue +28%
  • RF
    REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +613%

Funded once

  • MH
    MOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANTION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic House Trust of New York City Inc

The historic house trust of new york city (hht), in partnership with the new york city department of parks & recreation (nyc parks), advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites in new york…

Arts & Culture
2
Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Inc

To create and steward a 7.5-mile linear park along the Hudson River that solves existing safety concerns around visitation, provides welcoming access to people of all abilities, restores and protects natural resources, and enhances quality…

Environment
3
Sunnyview Hospital and Rehabilitation Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sunnyview rehabilitation hospital is a member of st. peter's health…

Health
4
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
5
The Trustees of Reservations

Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.

Environment
6
Shaker Museum and Library

Shaker museum elevates shaker material culture to animate shaker values and beliefs and inspire individuals and communities to deepen bonds and seek meaningful approaches to social, economic, environmental, and spiritual issues.

Arts & Culture
7
Montauk Historical Society

The purpose of the montauk historical society is to collect, restore, preserve and display historically significant buildings, objects and writings and to preserve and share the history and cultures of montauk and the east end for this and…

Arts & Culture
8
Hudson Highlands Land Trust Inc

The Hudson Highlands Land Trust conserves and cares for the lands and waters of the Hudson Highlands so that people and nature can flourish together for generations to come. (Continued on Schedule O)Our mission supports a vision of the…

Environment
9
Canterbury Shaker Village Inc

The mission of canterbury shaker village is to preserve and interpret the legacy of the shakers, providing a place for learning, reflection, and renewal of the human spirit. canterbury shaker village, inc., an internationally recognized…

Arts & Culture
10
Western Reserve Historical Society

Western reserve historical society preserves and uses its collections, historic sites, and museums to inspire people to discover the american experience by exploring the tangible history of northeast ohio.

Arts & Culture
11
The Trustees of the New York Society Library

The new york society library was founded in 1754 by the new york society, a civic-minded group formed in the belief that the availability of books would help the city of new york to prosper.

—
12
The Central New York Land Trust Inc

The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mohawk Hudson Land Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY: $253,200 · OtherTHE SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETYCAPITAL CITY GOSPEL MISSION: $105,000 · OtherCAPITAL CITY GOSPEL MISSIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $29,100 · OtherWMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $27,525 · OtherSTRIDE Inc: $19,270 · Other+23 more: $124,185 · Other+23 moreKNICKERBOCKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $46,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,200 · Arts & CultureREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $17,600 · Food & NutritionMOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANCY: $16,000 · EnvironmentHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $10,500 · EducationFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,900 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $2,800 · Human ServicesNORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 · Human Services
Other$558,280Arts & Culture$47,200Food & Nutrition$17,600Environment$16,000Education$10,500Human Services$7,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY: $253,200 over 9y, 86% of budgetKNICKERBOCKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $46,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetWMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $27,525 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIDE Inc: $19,270 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $17,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANCY: $16,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $8,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRENSSELAER LAND TRUST INC: $7,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SHAKER HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds KNICKERBOCKER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds STRIDE Inc ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOHAWK HUDSON LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds HINDMAN SETTLEMENT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds RENSSELAER LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Kiwi Foundation · Review Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ra Hunsdorfer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ra Hunsdorfer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ra Hunsdorfer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph