Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

R2 B4 Bramlage Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$293k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$582kHealth$522kArts & Culture$226kPublic Benefit$192kEducation$138kHuman Services$116kCommunity Improvement$71kYouth Development$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER GEARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
GEARY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$50,000
CL HOOVER OPERA HOUSE$27,368
Individual grant recipient$25,000
WAREHAM HALL$20,000
JUNCTION CITY MAIN STREET$20,000
410 IRISH DEN$11,500
FREEDOM FEST$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
QUALITY PLAY FOR ALL$4,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$1,635
SAINT PAUL'S OUTREACH$1,505
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY$1,500
BETHANY COLLEGE$1,500
COUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HOMECARE AND HOSPICE: $10k → 20%HOMECARE & HOSPICE: $9k → 20%HOMECARE AND HOSPICE: $8k → 20%HOMECARE & HOSPICE: $5k → 20%HOMECARE & HOSPICE: $5k → 20%HOMECARE AND HOSPICE: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
OH
MO
VA
KS
TN
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 45 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
37

Total granted

$2.0M
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
+66%

Still filing today

20%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GEARY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $51k · revenue +203% · 62% of their budget
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +0%
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • JC
    JASPER COUNTY CASA
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +22%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS XAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • JC
    JUNCTION CITYGEARY CO FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson County Memorial Hospital Inc

Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County

Health
2
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
3
Chase Memorial Nursing Home Co Inc

Chase memorial nursing home strives to be the provider and employer of choice in long term care with an emphasis on providing the highest quality care for our residents in a safe, clean and stimulating environment.

Health
4
Mennonite Friendship Communities Inc

Enhancing the Quality of Life of residents, staff and community at large within a framework of Mennonite values.

Human Services
5
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.

Housing & Shelter
6
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
7
Sayre Christian Village Nursing Home Inc

A non-profit senior living community dedicated to providing quality housing, rehabilitative services and long-term nursing care reflecting christian compassion for everyone.

Health
8
Good Shepherd Village At Endwell Inc

A continuing care retirement community that provides independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing for the elderly.

Housing & Shelter
9
Hesston College

Hesston college is a nonprofit corporation whose purpose is to serve mennonite church usa in its educational interests and to maintain and operate a college for educational, benevolent, charitable, and religious purposes.

Education
10
Good Shepherd Geriatric Center Inc

Mission statement: providing quality care and housing services for north iowa's 55+ population in a nurturing christian atmosphere.our commitment: our commitment is to support the elderly in maintaining or improving their qualtiy of life.…

Health
11
Good Shepherd-Fairview Home Inc

The good shepherd-fairview home, inc. operates a multi-level retirement community. its purpose is to provide suitable housing and health care for the elderly.

Health
12
The Congregational Home

Brewster's mission is to provide the services people need, when they need them, in the place they call home. brewster place is a life plan community (lpc) located in topeka, kansas. brewster offers an array of health care services for…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stormont-Vail Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Meadowlark Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Community Developm…Affordable Housing ProvidersYouth Education and Mentori…Regional Healthcare NetworksCommunity Health SystemsLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%16%<5yr11%8%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr15%32%35–55yr25%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%16%<5yr11%6%5–10yr16%1%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr15%65%35–55yr25%7%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 16% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
9%
1,530/17,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER GEARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $525,000 · OtherGREATER GEARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S MERCY — $224,200 · OtherCHILDREN'S MERCYCITY OF JUNCTION CITY — $190,744 · OtherCITY OF JUNCTION CITYCL HOOVER OPERA HOUSE — $176,143 · OtherCL HOOVER OPERA HOUSEGRETER GEARY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherAGINGWELL INC — $66,057 · Other+81 more — $464,223 · Other+81 moreGEARY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $280,903 · PhilanthropyGEARY COMMUNITY…GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $17,900 · PhilanthropyGREATER MANHATT…+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyJUNCTION CITY MAIN STREET INC — $53,200 · Arts & CultureWAREHAM HALL INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureGOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC — $36,070 · Human ServicesJASPER COUNTY CASA — $25,000 · Crime & LegalFLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $10,000 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGE — $4,500 · EducationBenedictine College — $4,500 · EducationTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $1,500 · EducationCENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,716,367Philanthropy$299,303Arts & Culture$73,200Human Services$36,070Crime & Legal$25,000Education$20,500Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEARY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $280,903 over 6y, 29% of budgetAGINGWELL INC — $66,057 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetJUNCTION CITY MAIN STREET INC — $53,200 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetGEARY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $51,250 over 2y, 62% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC — $36,070 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWAREHAM HALL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $17,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budget410 IRISH DEN — $11,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEARY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEADOWLARK HILLS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTORMONT-VAIL FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNDOWN SALUTE INC — $375 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMEADOWLARK FOUNDATION — $350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEARY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AGINGWELL INC
  • Who funds JUNCTION CITY MAIN STREET INC
  • Who funds GEARY COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY CASA
  • Who funds WAREHAM HALL INC
  • Who funds GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 410 IRISH DEN
  • Who funds FLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Manhattan Community FoundationKS25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Jellison Benevolent Society Inc · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization R2 B4 Bramlage Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to R2 B4 Bramlage Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to R2 B4 Bramlage Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph