Skip to content

· Private foundation

R Ruth Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kReligion$29kHealth$28kAnimals$25kEnvironment$23kHuman Services$21kFood & Nutrition$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$632k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL HISTORICAL FIRE FOUN$1,500
ST BARNABAS ON THE DESERT$1,500
ST CROIX ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER$1,250
RIO FERNANDO FIRE DISTRICT$1,000
THE ANZA TRAIL COALITION OF ARIZONA$1,000
AMIGOS BRAVOS$1,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
WOMEN'S BOARD OF BARROWS NEURO$800
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA CRUZ$750
TUBAC CENTER FOR THE ARTS$500
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$500
ARIZONA PUBLIC MEDIA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEARNING ALLY: $300 → 11%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT: $500 → 18%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $600 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $600 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $600 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
NM
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 59 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

59 repeat relationships: 55 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
6

Total granted

$276k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+70%

Still filing today

41%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    Amigos Bravos Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +206%
  • ES
    EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +167%
  • BN
    BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • SA
    STARSHINE ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SG
    SCOTTSDALE GIRLS & BOYS CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • CF
    CHANGE FOR EVERY CHILD
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona

To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.

—
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
8
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
9
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona

The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…

—
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest

We stabilize people during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley; the most unlike its peers is Art Ambassador. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL HISTORICAL FIRE FOUN: $21,500 · OtherNATIONAL HISTORICAL FIRE FOUNST BARNABAS ON THE DESERT: $20,500 · OtherST BARNABAS ON THE DESERTRIO FERNANDO FIRE DISTRICT INC: $13,000 · OtherRIO FERNANDO FIRE DISTRICT INCTUBAC CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $11,300 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE TUBAC PRESIDIO: $9,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherAmigos Bravos Inc: $8,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8,000 · Other+48 more: $131,915 · Other+48 moreST CROIX ANIMAL WELFARE CENTERINC: $7,750 · AnimalsEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY: $7,500 · AnimalsThe Animal League of Green Valley: $2,250 · AnimalsCenter for Food Safety: $6,500 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $2,500 · Food & NutritionHospice of the Valley: $4,300 · Human ServicesDREAM TREE PROJECT: $4,000 · Human ServicesLearning Ally Inc: $300 · Human ServicesBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $6,000 · Civil RightsVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $4,000 · Philanthropy
Other$231,415Animals$17,500Food & Nutrition$9,000Human Services$8,600Health$7,000Civil Rights$6,000Philanthropy$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmigos Bravos Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST CROIX ANIMAL WELFARE CENTERINC: $7,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY: $7,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Food Safety: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Santa Cruz: $5,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $4,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM TREE PROJECT: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $3,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC: $3,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY: $3,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $3,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTUBAC HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,400 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Animal League of Green Valley: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBorder Community Alliance Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Amigos Bravos Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST CROIX ANIMAL WELFARE CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Center for Food Safety ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Santa Cruz ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
  • Who funds DREAM TREE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHOENIX THEATRE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R Ruth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R Ruth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to R Ruth Foundation?

Find your warmest path to R Ruth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R Ruth’s filings →

More from the funding graph