· Private foundation
R & R & R Dodge Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE NEXT DOOR | $9,000 |
| JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $4,000 |
| COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS | $3,750 |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | $3,750 |
| MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART | $3,000 |
| SAFE SPACE | $2,000 |
| OREGON FOOD BANK | $1,500 |
| SEASIDE ROTARY FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MIRABELLA PORTLAND FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NEXT DOOR INC3× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +42%
MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +52%- JYJANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- DADETAIL AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTone grant, 2021 · $78k
- CCONFLUENCEone grant, 2022 · $2k
- NANATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."
Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.
Oregon environmental council champions equitable, innovative, and collaborative solutions to oregons environmental challenges for today and future generations.
The foundation board is comprised of members with diverse backgrounds and expertise who devote their shared commitment and passion to collectively support protection and restoration of the washington coast region salmon by providing…
Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Committee to Protect Journalists Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MARYHILL MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MIRABELLA PORTLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Seaside Rotary Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYCHILD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization R & R & R Dodge Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Community Transitional School — 7% of income from government
- Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.