Skip to content
R&T P Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

R&T P Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$6.2MEducation$3.0MHealth$1.1MPhilanthropy$550kCivil Rights$300kReligion$175kHuman Services$75kCrime & Legal$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT KESHER$50,000
THE JEWISH BOARD$25,000
BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE$25,000
SUMMER SEARCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $25k → 17%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $20k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE: $25k → 17%THE CHICK MISSION INC: $10k → 17%COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%COOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 13 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$11M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+36%

Still filing today

85%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +102%
  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +36%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • NS
    NYU SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • WM
    Winifred Masterson Burke Medical Researchgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • TC
    THE CHICK MISSION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
6
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
9
New York Studio School

The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)

—
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Winifred Masterson Burke Medical Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH MUSEUM: $5,822,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUMARTSCONNECTION INC: $400,000 · Arts & CultureARTSCONNECTION INC+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,600,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,010,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINA…ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL: $255,000 · EducationETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL+1 more: $10,000 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $550,000 · PhilanthropyProject Kesher: $170,000 · OtherPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherNYU SCHOOL OF LAW: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $40,000 · OtherCOOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHICK MISSION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $55,000 · Civil RightsBROWN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$6,232,500Education$3,875,000Philanthropy$550,000Other$395,000Human Services$155,000Civil Rights$130,000Community Improvement$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $5,822,500 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,600,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,010,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $550,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC: $400,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL: $255,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetProject Kesher: $170,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOKE SCHOOL AND INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWinifred Masterson Burke Medical Research: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICK MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPUBLIC ART FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization R&T P Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from R&T P Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to R&T P Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to R&T P Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on R&T P Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home