Skip to content

· Private foundation

Query on Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$159k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Social Science$221kEducation$215kScience & Tech$61kEnvironment$16kPublic Benefit$14kInternational$12kYouth Development$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $276k
$1,090
Median grant
7
States reached
$209k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$159,276
DENIM PICTURES LLC$117,000
ITHACA HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
Individual grant recipient$7,305
Individual grant recipient$3,357
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$2,000
SOCIAL SECURITY WORKS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,090
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$900
BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER$900
Individual grant recipient$900
NATIONAL AUDOBON SOCIETY$400
CHARITY WATCH$200
Individual grant recipient$108
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $900 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $900 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $900 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 28 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
30

Total granted

$357k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+20%

Still filing today

46%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalPublic BenefitEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • O
    OPENSECRETS
    4× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +181%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +37%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    5× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $25k
  • HL
    HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
12
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Publica Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $199,262 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDENIM PICTURES LLC: $117,000 · OtherDENIM PICTURES LLCITHACA HIGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherITHACA HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $24,857 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $20,000 · Other+42 more: $113,826 · Other+42 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,700 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,100 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $400 · Environment+2 more: $600 · EnvironmentOPENSECRETS: $6,600 · Public BenefitTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $2,700 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $400 · Public BenefitMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,600 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $1,700 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $800 · InternationalIthaca Public Education Initiative Inc: $3,500 · EducationWILLOW HILL SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500 · EducationPINE STREET INN INC: $3,900 · Human ServicesPOPULATION CONNECTION: $2,700 · Social Science
Other$529,945Environment$11,800Public Benefit$9,700International$7,100Education$5,000Human Services$3,900Social Science$2,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPENSECRETS: $6,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,290 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $3,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIthaca Public Education Initiative Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW HILL SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBBB WISE GIVING ALLIANCE: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERBIG SISTER FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPENSECRETS ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds Ithaca Public Education Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Query on Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Query on Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Query on Inc?

Find your warmest path to Query on Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Query on’s filings →

More from the funding graph