Skip to content

· Private foundation

Q & V Peterson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$88kHuman Services$88kCivil Rights$43kYouth Development$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kCrime & Legal$27kHealth$25kArts & Culture$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alameda County Food Bank$5,000
Ritter Center$5,000
Waterside Workshops$5,000
Human Kindness Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Guide Dogs for the Blind: $5k → 8%Eddy House: $5k → 10%Ritter Center: $8k → 8%Ritter Center: $8k → 8%Ritter Center: $7k → 8%Ritter Center: $5k → 8%Ritter Center: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OR
NV
PA
CA
VA
NC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 13 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$305k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+336%

Still filing today

62%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2019–2025 · $45k · revenue +112%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $43k · revenue +28%
  • WW
    WATERSIDE WORKSHOPS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • FC
    Frontline Catalystsgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue ×14
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF KRVM
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • BC
    Boulder Creek Recreation and Park District
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
3
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
7
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
8
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
9
Food Bank for Monterey County

To distribute food to alleviate hunger, provide emergency food services during a natural disaster, and conduct educational awareness programs relating to hunger issues in monterey county.

Unclassified
10
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
11
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
12
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ritter Center; the most unlike its peers is The Gift of Life Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $44,500 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKSan FranciscoMarin County Food Bank: $17,500 · OtherSan FranciscoMarin County Food BankMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $15,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterFamily Fire Foundation: $12,500 · OtherFamily Fire FoundationCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATIONSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $12,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKNight on the Streets: $10,000 · OtherWoman's Cancer Resource Center: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF KRVM: $8,000 · OtherBoulder Creek Recreation and Park District: $7,500 · OtherTHE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION: $7,500 · Other+8 more: $39,000 · Other+8 moreGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE B…RITTER CENTER: $32,500 · Human ServicesRITTER CENTEREDDY HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesEDDY HOUSESOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $42,500 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW…Human Kindness Foundation: $27,000 · Crime & LegalHuman Kindness Found…WATERSIDE WORKSHOPS: $36,000 · Arts & CultureWATERSIDE …Frontline Catalysts: $10,000 · EnvironmentEDDIES HOUSE: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$196,000Human Services$70,500Crime & Legal$69,500Arts & Culture$36,000Environment$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $44,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $42,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSIDE WORKSHOPS: $36,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $33,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRITTER CENTER: $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Kindness Foundation: $27,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDDIES HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEDDY HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE WORKSHOPS ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds RITTER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Human Kindness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Frontline Catalysts ↗
  • Who funds THE GIFT OF LIFE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EDDIES HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Q & V Peterson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Q & V Peterson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Q & V Peterson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Q & V Peterson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Q & V Peterson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph