· Private foundation
Pvh Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k67 grants · $232k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $500k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.7M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Apparel Impact Institute | $1,250,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $500,000 |
| MISA HYLTON FASHION ACADEMY INC | $250,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC | $250,000 |
| CUSTOM COLLABORATIVE | $225,000 |
| New Circles Community Services | $202,000 |
| FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHOLOGY FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| Fashion Council Germany E V | $179,693 |
| Stichting House of Denim | $162,510 |
| YourCause LLC FBO The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $160,494 |
| Graduate Fashion Foundation | $155,088 |
| ABCN | $145,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $126,692 |
| YourCause LLC FBO The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $122,224 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 79% of grant dollars ($27M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($7.2M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 21% of all-years giving ($7.2M)
26 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Pvh Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
135 repeat relationships — 75 still active in FY2024, 60 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Save The Children Federation Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +14%- AIAPPAREL IMPACT INSTITUTE3× · 2022–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +125%
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +37%
Funded once
- WCWABC Charity Foundationone grant, 2022 · $605k
- SHStichting Het Wereld Natuur Fondsone grant, 2022 · $310k
- RCRED CROSS SOCIETY OF CHINAone grant, 2020 · $285k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…
As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Judes Children Cancer Awarenedd Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
203 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 203 of the 323 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds APPAREL IMPACT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONEPULSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds MISA HYLTON FASHION ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE GLOBAL COMPACT ↗
- Who funds CUSTOM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVES WANT CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Montefiore Health System Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Tapestry Foundation Inc · Boyles-Eidson Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Open Society Institute · The Rockefeller Foundation · Global Impact · The Winston-Salem Foundation · The Coach Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pvh Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Attleboro Enterprises Inc — 86% of income from government
- Manavi Inc — 60% of income from government
- Good News Home Inc — 54% of income from government
- Safe & Sound Somerset Inc — 54% of income from government
- Goodwill Industries International Inc — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- National Black Justice Coalition Inc — 17% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Raritan Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc — 1% of income from government
- CROSSROADS4HOPE — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Clean the World Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Kids in Distress Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pvh Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Pvh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.