Skip to content
Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank at a glance

· Private foundation

Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$117kEducation$66kAnimals$45kFood & Nutrition$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kRecreation & Sports$23kArts & Culture$15kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE PEAKS INC$10,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE$8,000
BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC$8,000
ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC$7,000
NORTHERN LIGHTS WILDLIFE SOCIETY$6,000
ALASKA AVALANCHE SCHOOL INC$6,000
COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES$6,000
KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$5,000
THE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC$4,000
MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$4,000
NELSON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTRE SOCIETY$2,000
SOUTH OKANAGAN REHABILITATION CENTRE FOR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($285k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($41k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $9k → 16%LITTLE PEAKS INC: $10k → 13%ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC: $7k → 18%MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6k → 10%ALASKA AVALANCHE SCHOOL INC: $6k → 22%BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $8k → 16%LITTLE PEAKS INC: $5k → 13%ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLA: $3k → 18%ALPENGLOW PONY CLUB: $5k → 10%BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $8k → 16%LITTLE PEAKS INC: $5k → 13%ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC: $3k → 18%MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 10%BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $8k → 16%LITTLE PEAKS INC: $5k → 13%THE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC: $4k → 10%BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $8k → 16%KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $4k → 10%KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%ALPENGLOW PONY CLUB: $4k → 10%KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $4k → 10%KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%THE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC: $4k → 10%KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $4k → 10%EAST BRANCH FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $3k → 13%ALPENGLOW PONY CLUB: $3k → 10%EAST BRANCH FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $3k → 13%MAT-SU TRAILS & PARKS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%EAST BRANCH FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $3k → 13%MAT-SU TRAILS & PARKS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%EAST BRANCH FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $3k → 13%ALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION: $6k → 10%ALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER: $6k → 10%ALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER: $4k → 10%ALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER: $4k → 10%COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES: $6k → 10%COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES: $5k → 10%COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES: $5k → 10%COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES: $4k → 10%COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($41k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$41k · 15 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$312k · 18 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$312k
$14k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YT
    YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON
    5× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +44%
  • BC
    BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +104%
  • LP
    LITTLE PEAKS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • AT
    ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Wildlife Alliance

Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…

Environment
2
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-Seacc

SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…

Environment
3
Katmai Conservancy

Katmai Conservancy supports the preservation of Katmai National Park and Preserve its unique ecosystems scenic character and associated natural and cultural resources by promoting greater public interest appreciation and support through…

Environment
4
Alaska Trails

Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.

Recreation & Sports
5
Alaska Sustainability Initiative

To advance solutions that build the resilience and sustainability of Alaska, for its current and future residents and the natural systems upon which they depend.

Animals
6
Ahtna Intertribal Resource Commission

The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…

Environment
7
Adventurers and Scientists for Conservation

we ensure the availability of critical field data that accelerates conservation and climate solutions. we achieve our mission by mobilizing and training outdoor enthusiasts and local communities to collect high-quality scientific data that…

Environment
8
Sageland Collaborative

To provide science-based strategies for wildlife and land conservation.

Environment
9
Alpine Watershed Group

Watershed collaboration and stewardship

Environment
10
Home Range Wildlife Research

MISSION: To advance wildlife conservation by conducting high-quality research, educating aspiring biologists, and engaging local communities. In the face of vast environmental and social changes, we are committed to wildlife conservation…

Animals
11
Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council

The Council's mission is to initiate and continue the clean-up and preservation of the Watershed for the protection of current and future generations of Indigenous Peoples and for the continuation of the traditional Native way of life. The…

—
12
Higgins Lake Land Conservancy

Acquire and otherwise manage conservation of lands within the watershed of Higgins Lake

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone to Yukon; the most unlike its peers is Keene Valley Library Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON: $42,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE TO YUKONBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $41,000 · EnvironmentBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INCCoalition for Susitna Dam Alternatives: $23,500 · EnvironmentCoalition for Susitna Dam AlternativesALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE I…Musk Ox Development Corporation: $22,500 · OtherMusk Ox Development CorporationNORTHERN LIGHTS WILDLIFE SOCIETY: $22,000 · OtherNORTHERN LIGHTS WILDLIFE SOCIETYEAST BRANCH FRIENDS OF THE ARTS: $12,000 · OtherEAST BRANCH FRIENDS OF THE ARTSALPENGLOW PONY CLUB: $12,000 · OtherALPENGLOW PONY CLUBTHE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC: $8,000 · OtherTHE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INCIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherNELSON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTRE SOCIETY: $4,000 · Other+6 more: $14,000 · Other+6 moreLITTLE PEAKS INC: $25,000 · EducationLITTLE PEAKS INCKeene Valley Library Association: $24,500 · EducationKeene Valley Library A…THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLOR…Alaska Avalanche School Inc: $23,500 · Public Safety & DisasterALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER: $19,000 · AnimalsMAT-SU TRAILS & PARKS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Environment$116,500Other$98,500Education$65,500Public Safety & Disaster$23,500Animals$19,000Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON: $42,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $41,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE PEAKS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetKeene Valley Library Association: $24,500 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCoalition for Susitna Dam Alternatives: $23,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetAlaska Avalanche School Inc: $23,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMusk Ox Development Corporation: $22,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER: $19,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetMAT-SU TRAILS & PARKS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON ↗
  • Who funds BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE PEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Keene Valley Library Association ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Susitna Dam Alternatives ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Avalanche School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Musk Ox Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAT-SU TRAILS & PARKS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Alaska Community FoundationAK13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home