· Private foundation
Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LITTLE PEAKS INC | $10,000 |
| BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC | $8,000 |
| YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE | $8,000 |
| ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC | $7,000 |
| NORTHERN LIGHTS WILDLIFE SOCIETY | $6,000 |
| COALITION FOR SUSITNA DAM ALTERNATIVES | $6,000 |
| ALASKA AVALANCHE SCHOOL INC | $6,000 |
| KEENE VALLEY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| MUSK OX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $4,000 |
| THE UNITED STATES PONY CLUBS INC | $4,000 |
| NELSON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTRE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| SOUTH OKANAGAN REHABILITATION CENTRE FOR | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 87% of grant dollars ($285k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($41k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 58% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 13% of all-years giving ($41k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YTYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON5× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +44%
- BCBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +104%
- LPLITTLE PEAKS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +213%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $4k
- ATALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLAone grant, 2022 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support ecosystem-based wildlife management by increasing public awareness of wildlife issues, responding to information requests, advocating for science-based wildlife habitat management through proposal and comment submissions, and…
SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…
Katmai Conservancy supports the preservation of Katmai National Park and Preserve its unique ecosystems scenic character and associated natural and cultural resources by promoting greater public interest appreciation and support through…
Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.
To advance solutions that build the resilience and sustainability of Alaska, for its current and future residents and the natural systems upon which they depend.
The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…
we ensure the availability of critical field data that accelerates conservation and climate solutions. we achieve our mission by mobilizing and training outdoor enthusiasts and local communities to collect high-quality scientific data that…
To provide science-based strategies for wildlife and land conservation.
Watershed collaboration and stewardship
MISSION: To advance wildlife conservation by conducting high-quality research, educating aspiring biologists, and engaging local communities. In the face of vast environmental and social changes, we are committed to wildlife conservation…
The Council's mission is to initiate and continue the clean-up and preservation of the Watershed for the protection of current and future generations of Indigenous Peoples and for the continuation of the traditional Native way of life. The…
Acquire and otherwise manage conservation of lands within the watershed of Higgins Lake
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone to Yukon and the most unlike its peers is Keene Valley Library Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON ↗
- Who funds BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE PEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds Keene Valley Library Association ↗
- Who funds Coalition for Susitna Dam Alternatives ↗
- Who funds Alaska Avalanche School Inc ↗
- Who funds Musk Ox Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds ALASKA WILDBIRD REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALGONQUIN TO ADIRONDACKS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MAT-SU TRAILS & PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pumpkin Hill Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.