Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Puffer Garnier Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$850
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$7kInternational$3kEducation$2kReligion$2kHuman Services$1kEnvironment$1kHealth$800Public Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC$850
HOSPICE FOR THE FISHER HOME$700
EMILY DICKINSON MUSEUM$700
AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM$500
SURVIVAL CENTER$500
SAFE PASSAGE$500
ST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH$400
KESTREL LAND TRUST$300
AMHERST SENIOR CENTER$300
AMHERST CINEMA$300
DISTRICT ONE NEIGHORHOOD ASSOCIATION$200
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PENBROKE ASP: $200 → 8%ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $100 → 8%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $1k → 12%HISTORIC DEERFIELD: $500 → 14%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $1k → 10%JONES LIBRARY: $1k → 12%HISTORIC DEERFIELD: $500 → 14%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $850 → 10%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $500 → 12%HISTORIC DEERFIELD: $100 → 14%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $500 → 10%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $500 → 12%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $450 → 10%JONES LIBRARY: $500 → 12%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $250 → 10%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $500 → 12%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $200 → 10%KESTREL LAND TRUST: $500 → 12%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $200 → 10%KESTREL LAND TRUST: $300 → 12%KESTREL LAND TRUST: $250 → 12%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $250 → 12%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $250 → 12%AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM: $200 → 12%HOSPICE FOR THE FISHER HOME: $700 → 12%EMILY DICKINSON MUSEUM: $700 → 12%ST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 12%EMILY DICKINSON MUSEUM: $500 → 12%EMILY DICKINSON MUSEUM: $500 → 12%ST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 12%SAFE PASSAGE: $500 → 12%SURVIVAL CENTER: $500 → 12%ST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH: $400 → 12%AMHERST CINEMA: $300 → 12%AMHERST SENIOR CENTER: $300 → 12%THE JONES LIBRARY: $250 → 12%EMILY DICKINSON MUSEUM: $250 → 12%THE JONES LIBRARY: $250 → 12%THE JONES LIBRARY: $250 → 12%ST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH: $250 → 12%AMHERST CINEMA: $200 → 12%FRIENDS OF THE AMHERST SR CENT: $100 → 12%KESTREL LAND TRUST: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16k · 9 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -47% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$16k
$400

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-47%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JONES LIBRARY INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +77%
  • AC
    AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +46%
  • SC
    SURVIVAL CENTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $650 · revenue +215%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $200
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE AMHERST SR CENT
    one grant, 2018 · $100
  • KL
    KESTREL LAND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100 · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amherst Land Trust

Land conservation and open space preservation

2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
6
The Millicent Library

Public lending library

Education
7
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
8
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
9
Peacham Library Inc

Provides Public Library and information services to the Peacham community.

10
Gardiner Library Board of Trustees

The Gardiner Library Board of Trustees operates the public library that serves the Town of Gardiner and the surrounding areas of New York State.

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Survival Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Liberian Assistance Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM — $3,450 · OtherAMHERST HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUMST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCH — $1,650 · OtherST BRIGID CATHOLIC CHURCHKESTREL LAND TRUST — $1,050 · OtherKESTREL LAND TRUSTHOSPICE FOR THE FISHER HOME — $700 · OtherHOSPICE FOR THE FISHER HOMESAFE PASSAGE INC — $500 · OtherSAFE PASSAGE INCSURVIVAL CENTER — $500 · OtherSURVIVAL CENTERAMHERST SENIOR CENTER — $300 · Other+4 more — $600 · Other+4 moreTHE JONES LIBRARY INC — $2,250 · EducationTHE JONES LIBRARY INCAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $1,950 · EducationAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEESLiberian Assistance Program Inc — $3,450 · InternationalLiberian Assistance …HISTORIC DEERFIELD INC — $1,100 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC …AMHERST CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC — $500 · Arts & CultureAMHERST C…SURVIVAL CENTERS INC — $650 · Human ServicesKESTREL LAND TRUST INC — $100 · Environment
Other$8,750Education$4,200International$3,450Arts & Culture$1,600Human Services$650Environment$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLiberian Assistance Program Inc — $3,450 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTHE JONES LIBRARY INC — $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $1,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC DEERFIELD INC — $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC — $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Liberian Assistance Program Inc
  • Who funds THE JONES LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES
  • Who funds HISTORIC DEERFIELD INC
  • Who funds SURVIVAL CENTERS INC
  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC
  • Who funds AMHERST CINEMA ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds KESTREL LAND TRUST INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Lorber Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Puffer Garnier Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Safe Passage Inc48% of income from government
  • Survival Centers Inc6% of income from government
  • Amherst Cinema Arts Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Historic Deerfield Inc0% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph