Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Public Citizen Foundation Inc

Work for consumer rights.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$4.5MPublic Benefit$1.6MCommunity Improvement$519kCivil Rights$217kEducation$89kHealth$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kInternational$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $2,047,909 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,205,297 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $157,388 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $987k
  • $250k+2 grants · $975k
$86,400
Median grant
8
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND$500,000
PUBLIC CITIZEN INC$475,000
AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON$132,982
COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS$117,841
TEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE$113,886
ACHIEVING COMMUNITY TASKS SUCCESSFULLY$104,400
FAIR SHOT TEXAS$100,000
PHILADELPHIA PRIMITIVE BAPTIST CHURCH$100,000
EAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL$91,400
BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER$86,400
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY ADVOCATES OF GALENA PARK$73,800
COALITION FOR SENSIBLE SAFEGUARDS$66,200
FORT BEND COUNTY HOUSTON ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION$20,000
GENERATION VOTE EDUCATION FUND$15,000
CAROLINA FOR ALL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARIZONA CENTER: $45k → 11%ISAIAH: $65k → 14%CITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN: $100k → 7%AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON: $133k → 16%STAND UP AMERICA: $80k → 17%FAIR SHOT TEXAS: $100k → 10%AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON: $103k → 16%ARIZONA ADVOCACY NETWORK FOUNDATION: $80k → 11%FAIR SHOT TEXAS: $100k → 10%AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON: $71k → 16%COMMON DEFENSE EDUCATION FUND: $69k → 17%AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON: $68k → 16%AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON: $58k → 16%PUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $475k → 14%COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $76k → 16%AIR ALLIANCE OF HOUSTON: $69k → 16%COALITION FOR SENSIBLE SAFEGUARDS: $392k → 14%COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $61k → 16%COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $44k → 16%PUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $150k → 14%AIR ALLIANCE OF HOUSTON: $41k → 16%AIR ALLIANCE OF HOUSTON: $40k → 16%COALITION FOR SENSIBLE SAFEGUARDS: $66k → 14%ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY ADVOCATES OF GALENA PARK: $74k → 16%COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $118k → 16%COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS: $55k → 16%AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND: $514k → 14%COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORG: $54k → 16%AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND: $500k → 14%AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND: $500k → 14%AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND: $500k → 14%TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY SERVICES: $55k → 16%DEMOCRACY 21 EDUCATION FUND: $75k → 14%TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY SERVICE: $49k → 16%DEMOCRACY 21 EDUCATION FUND: $60k → 14%ACHIEVING COMMUNITY TASKS SUCCESSFULLY: $104k → 16%AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM EDUCATION FUND: $40k → 14%ACHIEVING COMMUNITY TASKS SUCCESSFULLY: $59k → 16%ACHIEVING COMMUNITY TASKS SUCCESSFULLY: $48k → 16%EAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL: $45k → 16%EAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL: $91k → 16%NETWORK EDUCATION PROGRAM: $50k → 14%BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER: $86k → 16%TEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE: $114k → 16%TEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE: $61k → 16%TEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE: $50k → 16%TEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE: $41k → 16%TEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE: $41k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 21 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
40

Total granted

$6.0M
$883k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+0%

Still filing today

95%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPublic BenefitEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +84%
  • PC
    PUBLIC CITIZEN INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $625k · revenue +71%
  • AA
    AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $583k · revenue +197%

Funded once

  • CT
    CITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -67%
  • AA
    ARIZONA ADVOCACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue -100%
  • IF
    Institute for Southern Studies Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue -84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Climate Equity Action Fund

The climate equity action fund (ceaf) works hand-in-hand with community-based partners in critical states across the country to secure and sustain policy wins for climate and clean energy. building on over a decade of trust with leading…

Environment
2
Electoral Collective Action

Electoral Collective Action coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.

Civil Rights
3
California Environmental Voters

To increase public awareness of elected officials' performances on environmental issues, to influence decisions of public officials on environmental legislation and policy, and to engage in related social welfare activities to promote and…

Civil Rights
4
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
5
Electoral Collective

Electoral Collective coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.

Civil Rights
6
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
7
Texas Campaign for the Environment

Empowering Texans to fight pollution through sustained grassroots organizing campaigns that shift corporate and governmental policy.

Environment
8
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
9
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
10
Clean Energy for America Inc

Clean Energy for Americas purpose is to engage with clean energy workers and advance the clean energy movement. CE4A highlights the feasibility and positive impact of a clean energy economy, educates policymakers and the general public on…

Environment
11
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
12
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Inc and the most unlike its peers is Coalition of Community Organizations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Social Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%18%<5yr14%23%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr15%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%12%<5yr14%37%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr18%16%20–35yr16%12%35–55yr15%1%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/69
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,932

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/62
Grantees still filing
30/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund — $2,053,650 · Public BenefitAmericans for Financial Reform Education FundPUBLIC CITIZEN INC — $625,000 · Public BenefitPUBLIC CITIZEN INCFAIR SHOT TEXAS — $200,000 · Public BenefitFAIR SHOT TEXASDEMOCRACY 21 EDUCATION FUND — $135,000 · Public Benefit+10 more — $262,000 · Public Benefit+10 moreAIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON — $583,366 · EnvironmentAIR ALLIANCE HOUSTONTEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE INC — $340,176 · EnvironmentTEXAS HEALTH AND ENVI…TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY — $103,438 · EnvironmentTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL J…BAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER INC — $93,400 · EnvironmentBAYOU CITY WATERKEEPE…ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY ADVOCATES OF GALENA PARK — $80,800 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNI…+6 more — $100,705 · Environment+6 moreCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS — $437,907 · Community ImprovementCOALITION OF …EAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL — $234,400 · Community ImprovementEAST HARRIS C…CITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN — $100,000 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS TRAD…+3 more — $47,990 · Community Improvement+3 moreTHE COALITION FOR SENSIBLE SAFEGUARDS INC — $457,800 · Civil RightsTHE COALITIO…STAND UP AMERICA INC — $105,000 · Civil RightsSTAND UP AME…ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $45,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENT…CAROLINA FOR ALL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $31,000 · Civil Rights+12 more — $147,100 · Civil Rights+12 morePHILADELPHIA PRIMITIVE BAPTIST CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherARIZONA ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherFORT BEND COUNTY HOUSTON ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION — $40,000 · OtherACHIEVING COMMUNITY TASKS SUCCESSFULLY — $36,150 · OtherENVIRONMENT TEXAS RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $18,000 · OtherISAIAH — $65,000 · OtherCONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER — $30,000 · Other+12 more — $107,406 · OtherAchieving Community Task Successfully — $279,300 · EducationOPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE — $10,000 · EducationInstitute for Southern Studies Inc — $70,000 · Social Science
Public Benefit$3,275,650Environment$1,301,885Community Improvement$820,297Civil Rights$785,900Other$476,556Education$289,300Social Science$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmericans for Financial Reform Education Fund — $2,053,650 over 5y, 15% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC — $625,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetAIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON — $583,366 over 8y, 11% of budgetTHE COALITION FOR SENSIBLE SAFEGUARDS INC — $457,800 over 2y, 94% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS — $437,907 over 8y, 56% of budgetTEXAS HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE INC — $340,176 over 6y, 25% of budgetAchieving Community Task Successfully — $279,300 over 5y, 22% of budgetEAST HARRIS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL — $234,400 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetFAIR SHOT TEXAS — $200,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY 21 EDUCATION FUND — $135,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetSTAND UP AMERICA INC — $105,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetTEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY — $103,438 over 2y, 15% of budgetCITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN — $100,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetBAYOU CITY WATERKEEPER INC — $93,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY ADVOCATES OF GALENA PARK — $80,800 over 2y, 30% of budgetARIZONA ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNETWORK EDUCATION PROGRAM NETWORK ADVOCATES FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE — $75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetInstitute for Southern Studies Inc — $70,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMON DEFENSE EDUCATION FUND INC — $69,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetISAIAH — $65,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $45,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetENERGY PROGRAMS CONSORTIUM — $37,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAROLINA FOR ALL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetCONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTexas Solar Energy Society Inc — $25,500 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION — $22,490 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRO POR LA JUSTICIA — $18,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetENVIRONMENT TEXAS RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER INC — $18,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetINDIVISIBLE PROJECT — $15,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROMOTE THE VOTE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY INC — $13,206 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $13,205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC — $10,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Common Ground — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN MARKETS INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Citizens for Clean Elections — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOur Revolution — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundTides FoundationWindward FundJacob and Terese Hers…Amalgamated Charitabl…United States Energy …Foundation to Promote…Hopewell FundHouston Endowment IncThe Ford FoundationResources Legacy FundNEO Philanthropy Inc
New Venture FundDC37.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Windward Fund · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Hopewell Fund · Houston Endowment Inc · The Ford Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Public Citizen Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines