Skip to content

California · Public charity

Ps Resorts

To create, foster and enhance events, attractions and activities that will attract visitors to palm springs and otherwise promote palm springs as a premier destination.

$692k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
20
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
25%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$112,500
Organizations funded a year
4 to 16
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.7M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 25% of the organizations Ps Resorts funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$687k21%
FY202412$580k25%
FY202311$489k18%
FY202211$387k45%
FY20215$158k20%
FY20204$169k0%
FY201916$671k50%
FY201811$426k55%
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.5MArts & Culture$811kCivil Rights$469kCommunity Improvement$360kRecreation & Sports$346kHuman Services$151kEnvironment$98kScience & Tech$50kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
City of Palm Springs$1,494,0008n/a
Greater Palm Springs Pride Inc$458,500834%
Cvspin Inc Tour de Palm Springs$168,000512%
Palm Springs International Film Society$135,00031%
The Desert Biennial Dba Desert X$122,50055%
Palm Springs Air Museum Inc$77,50050%
Made$75,00031%
Palm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation$75,00023%
Operation Good Works Inc$40,0002n/a
Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce$11,54412%
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Ps Resorts by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
City of Palm Springs$1,494,0008n/a
Greater Palm Springs Pride Inc$458,500834%
Cvspin Inc Tour de Palm Springs$168,000512%
Palm Springs International Film Society$135,00031%
The Desert Biennial Dba Desert X$122,50055%
Palm Springs Air Museum Inc$77,50050%
Made$75,00031%
Palm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation$75,00023%
Operation Good Works Inc$40,0002n/a
Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce$11,54412%
Palm Springs Cultural Center$10,00011%

Plus 29 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.3M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Ps Resorts supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Palm Springs Pride Inc: $458,500 over 8y, 34% of budgetCvspin Inc Tour de Palm Springs: $168,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetPalm Springs International Film Society: $135,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetThe Desert Biennial Dba Desert X: $122,500 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetPalm Springs Air Museum Inc: $77,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMade: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPalm Springs Plaza Theatre Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPalm Springs Chamber of Commerce: $11,544 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPalm Springs Cultural Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ps Resorts with peer funders

About Ps Resorts

How much does Ps Resorts give?
Ps Resorts reported 20 grants totaling $692,099 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Ps Resorts fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (38%), Arts & Culture (20%), Civil Rights (12%).
Who are Ps Resorts's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: City of Palm Springs ($1.5M), Greater Palm Springs Pride Inc ($459k), Cvspin Inc Tour de Palm Springs ($168k).
Does Ps Resorts fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ps Resorts?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Inland Empire Community Foundation, The Galen Family Foundation, The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation.
Where is Ps Resorts based?
Ps Resorts is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ps Resorts’ filings →

More from the funding graph