Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Protect Democracy Project

The mission of PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT is to prevent our democracy from declining into a more authoritarian form of government. We do this by working to strengthen the checks and balances that have held the executive branch accountable to the laws and longstanding practices that have protected our democracy through both democratic and…

$320k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
6
Organizations funded FY2022
83%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of Protect Democracy Project’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Protect Democracy Project named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $320k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’19
4
’20
2
’21
6
’22
9
’23
16
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
2
Total assets, FY2022
$95M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 83% of the organizations Protect Democracy Project funded were first-time grantees, receiving 69% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Public BenefitSocial ScienceEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20226$320k83%
FY20212$20k50%
FY20204$128k75%
FY20193$415kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.2MPublic Benefit$1.9MEducation$649kInternational$150kReligion$122kCommunity Improvement$60kCivil Rights$45kSocial Science$35kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 31 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Protect Democracy Project supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 30 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProtect Democracy United: $690,352 over 2y, 13% of budgetValues United: $510,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetRightcount Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetInterfaith America: $115,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIssue One: $112,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCoalition for Good Governance: $100,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetBusiness for America Education Fund: $100,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetInstitute for the Study of Modern Authoritarianism: $95,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetJoseph Rainey Center for Public Policy: $85,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetNorth Main Street Fund: $60,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican College of National Security Leaders Inc: $51,500 over 2y, 60% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Forward Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPublic Democracy America: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTeam Democracy Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetSojourners Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGeorgetown University: $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDemocracy a Journal of Ideas Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetKeystone Research Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTides Advocacy: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommon Cause Education Fund: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Values Coalition: $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetDefending Democracy Together Institute: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHp Alliance Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetThe Brookings Institution: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMormon Women For Ethical Government Foun dation: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetThe George Washington University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Christianity and Public Life: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 30.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Democracy Fund Inc · New Venture Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Catena Foundation · Tides Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Protect Democracy Project with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Protect Democracy Project?

Find your warmest path to Protect Democracy Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Protect Democracy Project

How much does Protect Democracy Project give?
Protect Democracy Project reported 6 grants totaling $320,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does Protect Democracy Project fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (67%), Public Benefit (21%), Education (7%).
Who are Protect Democracy Project's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Protect Democracy United ($690k), Values United ($510k), Rightcount Inc ($500k).
Does Protect Democracy Project fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 83% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Protect Democracy Project?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation, Hopewell Fund, Democracy Fund Inc.
Where is Protect Democracy Project based?
Protect Democracy Project is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Protect Democracy Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph