Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prosper Road Foundation Joan Evans & David Evans Co-Trustees

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$403k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$829kYouth Development$656kRecreation & Sports$66kHealth$51kCommunity Improvement$45kEnvironment$34kPhilanthropy$19k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $158k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH GUIDANCE$57,500
BRAVEN INC$50,000
TRAILS$50,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$37,500
MODERN CLASSROOM PROJECT$25,000
ONE MILLION DEGREES$25,000
ONEGOAL$25,000
BREAKTHROUGH$25,000
TRANSCEND$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
AUSTIN TOGETHER$12,500
MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE$12,500
SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC$12,500
THE ARTHUR PROJECT$12,500
NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTROPHY$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Arthur Project: $25k → 17%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $25k → 17%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $14k → 17%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $13k → 17%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $9k → 17%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $8k → 17%THE ARTHUR PROJECT: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
CA
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 18 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-18%

Still filing today

72%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YG
    Youth Guidance
    7× · 2019–2025 · $341k · revenue +65%
  • BI
    BRAVEN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $309k · revenue +97%
  • OM
    ONE MILLION DEGREES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $167k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • TF
    TURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -100%
  • EM
    EIGHT MILLION STORIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • MM
    Meadows Mental Health
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
2
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
3
New Teacher Center

New teacher center (ntc) is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to improving outcomes for all students by accelerating teacher and school leader effectiveness. from preschool through high school, (continued on schedule o)

Education
4
Today's Students Tomorrow's Teachers

To recruit, mentor and train culturally diverse and economically challenged students from high school through college, and place them as effective teachers and committed leaders who strengthen schools and communitities.

Education
5
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Beyond 12 Education Inc

To increase the number of low income, first generation, historically underrepresented students who graduate from our nation's colleges and universities. through a longitudinal student tracking platform and a personalized student coaching…

Education
8
Inroads Inc

To deliver innovative leadership development programs and creative solutions that identify, accelerate, and elevate underrepresented talent throughout their careers.

Education
9
National College Advising Corps Inc

College advising corps (cac) is the nation's largest nonprofit service organization dedicated to advancing educational equity and expanding opportunity for all high school students. cac provides college enrollment and career guidance to…

Education
10
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
11
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
12
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transcend Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eight Million Stories Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Youth Guidance: $340,760 · EducationYouth GuidanceONE MILLION DEGREES: $167,000 · EducationONE MILLION DEGREESTRANSCEND INC: $160,250 · EducationTRANSCEND INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $138,500 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXASUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoBREAKTHROUGH: $51,250 · Education+2 more: $22,875 · EducationBRAVEN INC: $309,100 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INCONEGOAL: $153,828 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOALEIGHT MILLION STORIES INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRAILS: $116,000 · OtherTRAILSCOLLEGE FORWARD: $32,500 · OtherCOLLEGE FORWARDTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · OtherTURNAROUND FOR C…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant…Meadows Mental Health: $25,000 · OtherMeadows Mental H…UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO (TMW): $24,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CH…NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTROPHY: $19,200 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER …8 MILLION STORIES: $15,750 · Other+2 more: $18,250 · Other+2 moreTHE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ARTHUR PROJECT: $100,750 · Human ServicesAUSTIN TOGETHER FUND: $57,250 · Community ImprovementVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $33,750 · EnvironmentMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $30,250 · Health
Education$980,635Youth Development$487,928Other$301,450Philanthropy$110,000Human Services$100,750Community Improvement$57,250Environment$33,750Health$30,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouth Guidance: $340,760 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBRAVEN INC: $309,100 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $167,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTRANSCEND INC: $160,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetONEGOAL: $153,828 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $138,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC: $110,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ARTHUR PROJECT: $100,750 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN TOGETHER FUND: $57,250 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $51,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $33,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE FORWARD: $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $30,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEIGHT MILLION STORIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $1,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Youth Guidance ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds TRANSCEND INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds THE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTHUR PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN TOGETHER FUND ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds TURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds EIGHT MILLION STORIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michael & Susan Dell FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prosper Road Foundation Joan Evans & David Evans Co-Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prosper Road Foundation Joan Evans & David Evans Co-Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc: 42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Prosper Road Foundation Joan Evans & David Evans Co-Trustees?

Find your warmest path to Prosper Road Foundation Joan Evans & David Evans Co-Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prosper Road Foundation Joan Evans & David Evans Co-Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph