Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Promise Partners

To empower a caring community that promises the well-being of every child.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.7MEducation$3.1MHuman Services$3.0MEmployment$82kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $874k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$27,173
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Southwest Iowa Families$400,028
Lutheran Family Services$197,875
West Central Community Action$184,347
Visiting Nurse Association$96,358
Cass County Public Health$95,000
Harrison County Home and Public Hea$85,000
Burgess Health Center$85,000
Mills County Public Health$69,730
Myrtue Medical Center$60,506
ISU Extension & Outreach Page Count$49,987
ISU Extension & OutreachFremont$49,466
Matura Action Corporation$27,173
Noble Initiative Foundation$25,000
Anita Childcare Center$25,000
Turnbull Child Development Center$23,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kids in the Village: $22k → 9%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $297k → 9%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $196k → 9%Ann Wickman Child Development Cente: $15k → 14%West Central Community Action: $184k → 9%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $176k → 9%Noble Initiative Foundation: $25k → 14%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $165k → 9%FAMILY INC: $511k → 12%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $142k → 9%FAMILY INC: $502k → 12%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $135k → 9%Lutheran Family Services: $469k → 12%West Central Community Action: $128k → 9%FAMILY INC: $457k → 12%WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $112k → 9%FAMILY INC: $436k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASK: $361k → 12%FAMILY INC: $349k → 12%Lutheran Family Services: $198k → 12%FAMILY INC: $109k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASK: $105k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $39k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $34k → 12%CHRISTIAN HOME ASSOCIATION CHILDREN: $32k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $30k → 12%Christian Home Association: $27k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA: $24k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.1M · 8 repeat orgs$816k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$9.1M
$96k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $721k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +316% · 88% of their budget
  • FI
    FAMILY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2.4M · revenue +102% · 33% of their budget
  • WC
    WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • EB
    ECI BOARDS-BOOST CORNER HMS
    one grant, 2022 · $37k
  • AC
    AHST COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • LC
    LEWIS CENTRAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

2
Children's Center

Provide childcare services

Human Services
3
Coulee Children's Center Inc

Coulee childrens center, a provider of childcare services proudly empowers and strengthen families by focusing on healthy development and school readiness

4
Grand View Child Development Center Inc

Provide affordable child care services to residents of des moines and surrounding communities

Human Services
5
Davis County Day Care Center

Preschool and Daycare services for residents of Bloomfield and surrounding communities. We strive to provide quality daycare before and after school services and 3 year old preschool.

6
Child Care Choicesinc

Public service for daycare

7
Kids World Inc

Provide day care services to the children in and around sac city, iowa

Human Services
8
County North Children's Center Inc

To offer quality child care at affordable prices.

Human Services
9
Child Day Care Association Inc

To provide childcare services to working families, emphasizing a quality education and nutrition programs for children ages six weeks through thirteen years.

Human Services
10
Rochester Child Care Center Inc

The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…

Human Services
11
Walnut Acres Day Care Center Inc

To provide a safe, nurturing and enriching environment for k-5 students before and after school and during the summer.

Human Services
12
Christ Church Day Care Inc

Building a stronger tomorrow through nurturing today.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Home Assn - Children's Square Usa and the most unlike its peers is Anita Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY INC — $2,363,757 · Human ServicesFAMILY INCWEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION — $1,536,246 · Human ServicesWEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTIONLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $1,285,438 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC+4 more — $120,973 · Human ServicesTHE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATION — $2,473,999 · HealthTHE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATIONSOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC — $1,075,482 · HealthSOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC+1 more — $85,000 · HealthPOTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT — $154,748 · OtherPOTTAWATTA…COUNCIL BLUFFS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $144,039 · OtherCOUNCIL BL…CASS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $95,000 · OtherCASS COUNT…Harrison County Home and Public Hea — $85,000 · OtherHarrison C…MILLS COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH — $69,730 · OtherMILLS COUN…SHELBY COUNTY CHRIS A MYRTUE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $60,506 · OtherSHELBY COU…ISU Extension & Outreach Page Count — $49,987 · OtherISU Extens…ISU Extension & OutreachFremont — $49,466 · OtherISU Extens…ECI BOARDS-BOOST CORNER HMS — $37,300 · Other+12 more — $156,020 · Other+12 moreMATURA ACTION CORPORATION — $27,173 · Community ImprovementANITA FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentKOUNTRY KIDS CHILD CARE — $14,073 · Education
Human Services$5,306,414Health$3,634,481Other$901,796Community Improvement$27,173Youth Development$25,000Education$14,073

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATION — $2,473,999 over 9y, 88% of budgetFAMILY INC — $2,363,757 over 6y, 33% of budgetWEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION — $1,536,246 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $1,285,438 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC — $1,075,482 over 9y, 13% of budgetBURGESS HEALTH CENTER — $85,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA — $58,973 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetANITA FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetOUR HOUSE CHILD DEV — $23,100 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetKIDS IN THE VILLAGE — $22,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetESSEX CHILD CENTER — $16,800 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetNishna Valley Family Young Mens Christian Association — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VISITING NURSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY INC
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST IOWA FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds BURGESS HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA
  • Who funds MATURA ACTION CORPORATION
  • Who funds ANITA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LAKIN FOUNDATION CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF GRISWOLD
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE CHILD DEV
  • Who funds KIDS IN THE VILLAGE
  • Who funds ESSEX CHILD CENTER
  • Who funds Nishna Valley Family Young Mens Christian Association
  • Who funds KOUNTRY KIDS CHILD CARE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Western IowaIA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Western Iowa · Iowa West Foundation · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Clarinda Foundation Inc · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Promise Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph