Loading…
· Public charity
PROJECT ANIMALAID
Our mission is to collect donated, either new or used, veterinary/medical equipment, veterinary based technology and veterinary/medical supplies and distribute them to veterinarians working under the umbrella of nonprofit/non-governmental organizations whose missions are to improve the health and welfare of animals.
$253k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants
7
Communities
$96k
Largest
01What you fund
01beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
wildlife
2020
—
2021
rescue
2022
—
2023
affordableshelterhumanepreventsurroundingfixwest
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
02FY2022 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k5 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$6,643
Median grant
7
States reached
$641k
Total assets
Largest grants
- VARIOUS DONATIONS UNDER 5000$95,533
- LEECH LAKE LEGACY$15,962
- GREENWOOD WILDLIFE REHABILITATION$14,380
- TULSA SPCA$10,914
- LOCKWOOD ANIMAL RESCUE CENTER$6,643
- VETERINARY INITIATIVES FOR ENDANGER$5,918
- MAZIE'S MISSION$5,885
- KITTEN KRAZY$5,767
- NORTHERN COLORADO FRIENDS OF FERALS$5,146
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 92% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Animal Rescue of the Rockies
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
Animals
2
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
3
Care and Helping Animals Survive Emergencies
—
4
Rift Valley Wildlife Clinics
A not for profit organization dedicated to improving the welfare of domestic animals, wildlife and
Animals
5
Wild Canine Rescue
Wild canine rescue is devoted to saving animals in need. dedicated to proper care and welfare of animals who are homeless, abandoned and abused. wild will rescue dogs when they have run out of time in shelters or are in need of medical…
Animals
6
Harmony Animal Rescue Clinic
Helping animal rescue organizations save more lives by providing timely, low-cost veterinary care is the mission of harmony animal rescue clinic.
Animals
7
Rescuing Unwanted Furry Friends
Animals
8
Wildlife Rescue Center of Napa
See Schedule O. We support and advocate for wildlife through: rehabilitation, educaiton, community outreach and partnerships in order to promote sustainable and healthy eco-systems in Napa County for the present and future generations.
Unclassified
9
The Animal Medical Center
To operate an institute for veterinary education and specialty care, (cont'd on schedule o) clinical research and charity care for companion animals in new york city.
Animals
10
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc
Aminal Rescue
Animals
11
Kentucky Humane Society - Animal Rescue
The kentucky humane society is a champion for companion animals, through leadership, education and proactive solutions, we are creating more compassionate communities.
Animals
12
Felines & Friends New Mexico
Felines & friends is a "second chance" rescue and placement organization focusing on providing vet care and socialization for cats and kittens who might not otherwise find homes through animal shelters. since 2002, we have placed over…
Animals
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Colorado Friends of Ferals and the most unlike its peers is Dazzle Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
11%
3,769/33,395
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
04the grantee network
21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$115,831Animals$44,550Arts & Culture$5,767
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Greater Good CharitiesWA21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Greater Good Charities · Petsmart Charities Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Lauretta Boyd Charitable Trust · Otter Cares Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Best Friends Animal Society · Petco Love · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation PROJECT ANIMALAID funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LEECH LAKE LEGACY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~35 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 460840535 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LEECH LAKE LEGACY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 35 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Project Animalaid?
Find your warmest path to Project Animalaid through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines