Skip to content

· Public charity

Project 40 31 Inc

Project 40:31, inc.

$740k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$1.1MYouth Development$175kHousing & Shelter$145kEducation$70kHuman Services$70kReligion$40kFood & Nutrition$30k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $185k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO$400,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS$75,000
PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC$60,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM AREA$50,000
CROSSWINDS COMMUNITY CHURCH$40,000
LOVINGTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$30,000
LIGHT OF LEA COUNTY$25,000
HEARTS DESIRE INC$15,000
UNITY RECOVERY SOLUTIONS$15,000
ISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN INC$10,000
OPTION INC$10,000
LOVINGTON FOOD COALITION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%OPTION INC: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Project 40 31 Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 93%.

Project 40 31 Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 9 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+31%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO
    3× · 2021–2024 · $930k · revenue +74%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $175k · revenue +25%
  • LO
    LIGHT OF LEA COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • CC
    CROSSWINDS COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • OI
    OPTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • IS
    ISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
2
Home for Homeless Women
—
3
Favor House Ministries Inc

To provide temporary housing for substance abusers

Health
4
Hope Homes Inc

The organization provides residential facilities for men and women in recovery from addictive disorders

Philanthropy
5
Hope House Inc

Counseling services to individuals for substance abuse, domestic violence, general classes, anger management, day sessions, parenting classes, ged and other educational classes. supply clothing and food to needy.

Health
6
Hope Again

Hope again reached out in the name of christ to the disenfranchised of hollywood offering god's love, assistance with food, housing, clothing employment skills and bible classes. the lighthouse opened in august 2001 and has housed up to 16…

—
7
Beauty for Ashes Women's Home Inc

Drug addiction rehabilitation program

Health
8
Deming Silver Linings

Provide essential services to homeless persons including food clothing toiletries bedding shelter when available referrals to other service providers

Human Services
9
Hope House Rescue Mission Inc

Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…

Human Services
10
Hesed House of Hope Inc

To operate a homeless shelter to provide shelter and food to those who are without.

Human Services
11
Hope Ridge Recovery Inc

Provide safe haven for recovering women

Health
12
Hope House of Scott County

Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light of Lea County; the most unlike its peers is Unity Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO: $930,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICOLOVINGTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $70,000 · OtherLOVINGTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICTCROSSWINDS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC: $175,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC: $135,000 · HealthPALMER DRUG…UNITY RECOVERY INC: $35,000 · HealthUNITY RECOV…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FO…HEARTS DESIRE INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterHEARTS DES…LIGHT OF LEA COUNTY: $60,000 · Human ServicesOPTION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLOVINGTON FOOD COALITION: $20,000 · Food & NutritionISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN: $10,000 · Religion
Other$1,040,000Youth Development$175,000Health$170,000Housing & Shelter$145,000Human Services$70,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO: $930,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC: $175,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC: $135,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM: $110,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetLIGHT OF LEA COUNTY: $60,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetUNITY RECOVERY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetHEARTS DESIRE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetLOVINGTON FOOD COALITION: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetOPTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

JF Maddox FoundationNM22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: JF Maddox Foundation · United Way of Lea County Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Project 40 31 Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project 40 31 Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Project 40 31 Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Project 40 31 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Project 40 31’s filings →

    More from the funding graph