· Public charity
Project 40 31 Inc
Project 40:31, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $155k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $185k
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO | $400,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS | $75,000 |
| PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC | $60,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM AREA | $50,000 |
| CROSSWINDS COMMUNITY CHURCH | $40,000 |
| LOVINGTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $30,000 |
| LIGHT OF LEA COUNTY | $25,000 |
| HEARTS DESIRE INC | $15,000 |
| UNITY RECOVERY SOLUTIONS | $15,000 |
| OPTION INC | $10,000 |
| ISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN INC | $10,000 |
| LOVINGTON FOOD COALITION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Project 40 31 Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO3× · 2021–2024 · $930k · revenue +74%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $175k · revenue +25%
- LOLIGHT OF LEA COUNTY2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- CCCROSSWINDS COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $40k
- OIOPTION INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +31%
- ISISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHENone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Assisting and housing females in recovery
To provide temporary housing for substance abusers
The organization provides residential facilities for men and women in recovery from addictive disorders
Counseling services to individuals for substance abuse, domestic violence, general classes, anger management, day sessions, parenting classes, ged and other educational classes. supply clothing and food to needy.
Hope again reached out in the name of christ to the disenfranchised of hollywood offering god's love, assistance with food, housing, clothing employment skills and bible classes. the lighthouse opened in august 2001 and has housed up to 16…
Drug addiction rehabilitation program
Provide essential services to homeless persons including food clothing toiletries bedding shelter when available referrals to other service providers
Hope house rescue mission strives to eliminate homelessness. our mission is "to break the cycle of poverty and despair... one life at a time." we provide physical, emotional, mental and spiritual resources regardless of race, religion or…
To operate a homeless shelter to provide shelter and food to those who are without.
Provide safe haven for recovering women
Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light of Lea County and the most unlike its peers is Unity Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC ↗
- Who funds PALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM ↗
- Who funds LIGHT OF LEA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HEARTS DESIRE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds LOVINGTON FOOD COALITION ↗
- Who funds OPTION INC ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: JF Maddox Foundation · United Way of Lea County Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Project 40 31 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Project 40 31 Inc?
Find your warmest path to Project 40 31 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.